Euclid's Elements: Proposition 7

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AntiMe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Euclid's Elements, specifically Proposition 7, which asserts that angle ADC is greater than angle DCB, leading to the conclusion that angle CDB is significantly greater than angle DCB. The participant expresses confusion regarding the logical connection between these angles, particularly questioning the assumption that angle CDB must be greater than DCB. The proposition's reasoning hinges on the relationships between the angles, as outlined in Euclid's geometric principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euclidean geometry principles
  • Familiarity with angle relationships and comparisons
  • Basic knowledge of geometric proofs
  • Experience with reading classical mathematical texts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Euclid's Elements, focusing on the definitions and postulates relevant to angles
  • Review geometric proofs related to angle comparisons
  • Explore the implications of Proposition 7 in the context of subsequent propositions
  • Analyze examples of angle relationships in Euclidean geometry
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying geometry and classical texts, educators teaching Euclidean principles, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of geometric proofs.

AntiMe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Alright so, I decided to read some Euclid's Elements for my own personal gain (became interested while reading Stewart's Precal, and I think it might help with Calculus) and I'm stuck on proposition 7, mainly because I really want to understand the reasoning behind it and I just can't seem to make a connection.I pretty much understand the basis of what proposition 7 is trying to prove or demonstrate, but I just can't get around the fact that in the statement that "the angle ADC is greater than the angle DCB; therefore the angle CDB is much greater than the angle DCB" doesn't make sense to me. ADC is not equal to CDB.

Maybe I'm just too stupid to understand, but where is the assumption that angle CDB must be greater than DCB made plausible?

Here is the link to the proposition
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
CDB is greater than CDA, which equals DCA, which is greater than DCB. Thus CDB is "much" greater than DCB.
 

Similar threads

Graduate Horn angles and Euclid's elements
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Euclid's elements book 3 proposition 20
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Undergrad Why do we need postulate 4 in Euclid's element (P14)?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Graduate Euclid's Elements - The Application of Areas
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Graduate Euclid's elements proposition 15 book 3
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
MHB Understanding Bland's Proof of Proposition 4.3.14: Primitive Elements of Modules
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Measurable Functions .... Lindstrom, Proposition 7.3.7 .... ....
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Graduate Is It Possible to Prove Euclid's Propositions with a New Logic?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Undergrad Matrix elements of Hamiltonian include Dirac delta term
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Graduate Is Euclid's Fourth Postulate Redundant?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K