In Heath's commentary on Euclid's Elements he stresses the importance of the application of areas (Book I Proposition 44) with, "The marvellous ingenuity of the solution is indeed worth of the 'godlike men of old'...".(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The proposition, "To a given straight line to apply, in a given rectilineal angle, a parallelogram equal to a given triangle" seemed to me to be proven with, "Let the parallelogram BEFG be constructed equal to the triangle C, in the angle EBG which is equal to the rectilineal angle D [I.42]", but he goes on to employ I.43 (complements of a parallelogram about its diameter are equal to one another) to be able to change the dimensions of the area, but to hold the area constant.

Now I understand that that is important in and of itself, but I don't see why using [I.42] isn't 'applying' the area to the straight line.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Euclid's Elements - The Application of Areas

Loading...

Similar Threads - Euclid's Elements Application | Date |
---|---|

Euclid's elements book 3 proposition 20 | Jun 18, 2015 |

Horn angles and Euclid's elements | Jun 17, 2015 |

Euclid's elements proposition 15 book 3 | Jun 17, 2015 |

How to best read Euclid's Elements | Feb 27, 2015 |

Euclid's element (P14) | Jun 3, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**