Euler product and Goldbach conjecture

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Euler product related to the Riemann zeta function and its implications for the Goldbach conjecture. It establishes a relationship between the function f(s) and the decomposition of integers into sums of primes, specifically addressing the conditions under which the conjecture holds true. The conversation highlights the use of the Perron formula to derive the function A(x) and its connection to the floor function, ultimately leading to a formulation of f(s) that can be numerically validated. Key mathematical expressions and integrals are presented to support the conclusions drawn.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Riemann zeta function and its properties
  • Familiarity with the Goldbach conjecture and its implications in number theory
  • Knowledge of the Perron formula and its applications in analytic number theory
  • Basic concepts of prime number decomposition and floor functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the Goldbach conjecture in modern number theory
  • Study the properties and applications of the Riemann zeta function
  • Learn about the Perron formula and its role in analytic number theory
  • Investigate numerical methods for validating conjectures in prime number theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in advanced topics related to prime numbers and conjectures in mathematics.

eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
In an anlaogy with the Euler product of the Riemann function we make:

\prod_{p}(1+e^{-sp})=f(s) of course we have that:

f(p1+p2+p3)=f(p1)f(p2)f(p3) f(x)=exp(-ax) if Goldbach Conjecture is true then p1+p2= even and p5+p6+p8=Odd for integer n>5? then this product should be equal to:

f(s)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a(n)e^{-sn} where the a(n) is the function that tells in how many ways and odd or even number can be descomposed as a sum of 2 or 3 primes, we now define:

A(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{x}a(n) if a(n)=1 for every n then using Perron formula we get that A(x)=[x] (floor function) so we would have that:

f(s)=(1-e^{-s}) then if correct take numerical values to proof that the product and f(s) are equal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry there,s a mistake if we set:

\prod_{p} (1-e^{-sp}=f(s)= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a(n)e^{-sn}= \int_{0}^{\infty}A(x)e^{-sx}

And using the same trick Riemann did we have that:

f(s)= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{g(x^{1/n})}{n}

where g(x)=\pi (lnx) so from this we could conclude that:

f(x)= \frac{1}{2 \pi i}\int_{C} ds \frac{ ln \zeta(s) }{s}ln^{s} (t)

Where C is the real line Re(s)>c for a real c constant
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
939
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K