Euler Totient Formula for Prime Powers | Help Needed for Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter sutupidmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a formula for Euler's totient function, φ(p^n), where p is a prime number. Initial observations suggest that φ(2^n) equals 2^(n-1) and φ(3^n) equals 2*3^(n-1), but the poster struggles to prove these formulas formally. They attempted to use induction but felt they lacked sufficient knowledge about the properties of the totient function. A key insight shared is that a number is relatively prime to p^n if it is not divisible by p, which aids in counting the non-relatively prime numbers. Ultimately, the poster gains clarity on the problem after engaging with the community.
sutupidmath
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Well, the question is to find a formula for \phi(p^n) where \phi is the Euler's totient, and p is a positive prime.



Homework Equations



\phi(2^n) well in this case here is what i did, i first took n=1, n=2, n=3, and it looks like

\phi(2^n)=2^{n-1} but i am failing to prove it, because this is just by observation.

Also i tried

\phi(3^n) and by observing what happens when, n=1,2,3 etc, this one also looks like the general formula for any n is going to be

\phi(3^n)=2*3^{n-1} again i wasn't able to prove this one formally either.

I tried in both cases to prove it by induction, but i have a feeling that i need to know more properties about that function in order to know what operations i can perform. We, basically have only learned what euler's function is, and that's it.

The Attempt at a Solution




I really don't know whot to go about it.

Well, i gave it a shot, but nothing
say n=1 then

\phi(p)=p-1 since the group of invertibles is going to have p-1 elements.

Now, let n=2

\phi(p^2)=?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know that 1- xn= (1- x)(1+ x+ x2=+ ... + xn-2+ xn)? That's all you need. The proper divisors or pn are precisely 1, p, ..., pn-1.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Do you know that 1- xn= (1- x)(1+ x+ x2=+ ... + xn-2+ xn)? That's all you need. The proper divisors or pn are precisely 1, p, ..., pn-1.

It's not even that hard, is it? A number is relatively prime to p^n only if it isn't divisible by p. Count the numbers that AREN'T relatively prime to p^n (i.e. p,2p,3p,4p...p^n-p). Now count ALL the numbers less that p^n. Subtract.
 
Well, thanks guys a lot, i see it now!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K