A Euler vs. Tait (steady precession vs... what?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trying2Learn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler Precession
Click For Summary
Euler angles and Tait-Bryan angles are two approaches to studying body rotations, with key differences in their axis representation. Tait-Bryan angles involve distinct rotations about three axes, while Euler angles use the same axis for the first and third rotations. In Euler angles, the concept of "Steady Precession" describes a scenario with constant precession and spin rates. The analogous case in Tait-Bryan angles is known as "Steady Turn," where the yaw rate is constant, pitch rate is zero, and roll rate is constant. This term is frequently applied in aviation and aerospace contexts.
Trying2Learn
Messages
375
Reaction score
57
TL;DR
what is the analogue of steady precession when using the Tait -Bryan angles
Good Morning

When one studies body rotations, there are two general approaches one uses: Euler Angles vs. Tait-Bryan Angles.

The significant difference is that:
  • Tait–Bryan angles represent rotations about three distinct axes (e.g. x-y-z, or x-y′-z″): Yaw, Pitch, Roll
  • Euler angles use the same axis for both the first and third elemental rotations (e.g., z-x-z, or z-x′-z″): Precession, Nutation, Spin

With Euler angles, there is a special case of STEADY PRECESSION: precession rate is constant, nutation rate is 0, spin rate is constant.

Is there a NAME for the analogous case, when modeling with Tait? Yaw rate is constant, pitch rate is 0, roll rate is constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there is a name for the analogous case in Tait-Bryan angles. It's called "Steady Turn," also known as "Constant Turn" or "Banked Turn." In this case, the yaw rate is constant, the pitch rate is zero, and the roll rate is constant. The term "banked turn" refers to the fact that the vehicle or object is banked or tilted to one side, like an airplane during a turn. This term is commonly used in aviation and aerospace engineering.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K