News European Court Ruling on UK Taxation Laws

  • Thread starter Thread starter cobalt124
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Taxes Uk
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities of tax systems in the U.S. and U.K., particularly focusing on the significant portion of the population that does not pay federal income tax. It highlights that approximately 40% of Americans are non-taxpayers, with many benefiting from tax credits and deductions that offset their tax liabilities. The conversation also touches on the progressive nature of the U.S. tax system, where the top earners contribute a substantial share of total taxes, raising questions about fairness and the effectiveness of the system. Concerns are expressed about the influence of wealth in politics and the potential for an oligarchy to emerge, complicating the push for tax reform. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to taxation that considers both equity and the provision of public services.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #53
Jack21222 said:
Where's the other 600 billion?
What's your point? Those cuts are well over $1T, and with the economy improving a bit the US federal government will see a few more percent in revenue in 2011. Cut the deficit that much and the US can carry it for a few years, while the US continues to exit Iraq and Afghanistan starts to unwind.
 
  • #54
mheslep said:
What's your point? Those cuts are well over $1T, and with the economy improving a bit the US federal government will see a few more percent in revenue in 2011. Cut the deficit that much and the US can carry it for a few years, while the US continues to exit Iraq and Afghanistan starts to unwind.

Oh look, moving goalposts. How quaint.
 
  • #55
Jack21222 said:
Oh look, moving goalposts. How quaint.
Don't be silly. I didn't move my goal posts. Besides, if you have no point that you can state, what do you care?
 
  • #56
mheslep said:
Don't be silly. I didn't move my goal posts. Besides, if you have no point that you can state, what do you care?

First, you said spending cuts alone can solve the problem.

Now, it's spending cuts PLUS a growing economy can solve the problem. Moving goalpost.
 
  • #57
Jack21222 said:
First, you said spending cuts alone can solve the problem.

Now, it's spending cuts PLUS a growing economy can solve the problem. Moving goalpost.
Spending cuts alone can "solve the problem", which to my mind is getting the US government on a sustainable financial path with no federal tax rate increases. Then you asked for a zero deficit ("Wheres the other ..."), I assume meaning in this coming year. Ok, the spending cuts I listed plus a growing economy (and assuming no more than current growth) would likely zero the deficit.
 
  • #58
mheslep said:
Yes they can.

All I'm saying is we need incentives for reinvestment into our manufacturing segment. If we're going to increase exports, we need to build - something.
 
  • #59
Mech_Engineer said:
Are you making an argument, or are you just disagreeing because you're sure there's another reason, you just don't know what it is?

In reality, the poor are on average richer too. The gap has just widened between the richest and the poorest. But like I said, poor fiscal practices will tend to perpetuate poor economic position. You don't see payday and car title loans making a killing on the rich, do you?

Maybe I missed your point here, which was "it isn't the job of taxes to narrow the income disparity in the country", yes? My point is totally off topic and shouldn't be pursued in this thread, basic common sense tells me that cannot be the only cause for the poor getting poorer, other possible causes being poor education, ghettoisation of poor communities, crime, poor welfare, and so on. I don't understand what you mean in the last sentence.
 
  • #60
cobalt124 said:
Maybe I missed your point here, which was "it isn't the job of taxes to narrow the income disparity in the country", yes? My point is totally off topic and shouldn't be pursued in this thread, basic common sense tells me that cannot be the only cause for the poor getting poorer, other possible causes being poor education, ghettoisation of poor communities, crime, poor welfare, and so on. I don't understand what you mean in the last sentence.

The payday loan stores and pawn shops typically target people living paycheck to paycheck.
 
  • #61
When people get upset about well-to-do people not paying their "fair share" -- aside from missing the obvious fact that they carry the vast majority of the tax burden, they miss the whole point of the role of high income in a Capitalistic Free Enterprize System.

People have an emotional reaction to the big houses, fancy cars, and other material perks of the wealthy. That stuff is peanuts. If you took all of that stuff away and redistributed the proceeds from the sales, it would be just a drop in the bucket toward satisfying the goals of progressive tax proponents.

The real money is that which they invest. The major point missed is that the wealth of the well-to-do is a key cog in the engine of our econmony--including job creation. The vast majority of the assets of the well-to-do are actually already "donated" -- given to others. Even when they get interest back on their wealth allocations, they just give it away again (keeping just a small percentage for personal perks).

They aren't putting their money in a mattress. They are literally giving it to others who start up new companies, expand existing companies, build hospitals, fund municiple projects, build libraries, provide capital for construction companies so they have the front-end capital to take on construction of buildings, bridges, highways, etc.

And their money is also provided to funds from which lower income people borrow to buy cars and houses. And it's done much more efficiently than the government mode of redistribution of income.

That's what Capitalism and Free Enterprize is all about. Now, the proponents of high corporate taxes as well as excessive personal income taxes for the wealthy would unwittingly induce the unintended consequences of choking of this whole process (some progressives, socialsts and Marxists would choke intentionally). This is the process by which this country developed its technology and high standard of life over generations. Socialist countries actually benefitted from the creativity that evolved naturally in the Free Enterprize environment of the U.S. The U.S. Capitalists put up the seed Capital. Sure, Canada may have low cost medicine, reaping the fruits of R&D investment capital in the U.S.

If the government would get out of the way and quit the ever increasing confiscation of wealth, we could continue on an established path of success and excellence. The government's redistribution of wealth is no where near as successful in resolving the problems of the poor as the the wealthy are by investing the vast majority of their wealth in projects leading to job creation.

And the thousands of investors of discretionary money make far better decisions about where money should be directed as compared to government beauracracy. People like Bill Gates manage their money much better--to take away another couple of billion of his wealth is to simply penalize all of those who would have benefitted. And if you don't like Bill's allocation of his wealth, at least there are many many more institutions taking varieties of approaches. Free Enterprize takes the best of the myriad of approches and sustains the ones that work.

God bless the rich, the entrepreneurs, and the innovators. May liberals, progressives, socialists, and Marxists be unsuccessful in their attempts to hijack the process.
 
Last edited:
  • #62
WhoWee said:
The payday loan stores and pawn shops typically target people living paycheck to paycheck.
Have you ever been to cities that are dominated by military facilities? If so, you will know that that these business are established to suck money out of out of our military personnel. You will also see (in the deep south, especially, IME) a preponderance of "title-pawn" companies that are set up to steal the assets of people who might have to ditch things of value to provide for their families before they are deployed overseas. There is a whole industry built around exploiting the members of our armed services. Do you not know this?
 
  • #63
turbo-1 said:
You will also see (in the deep south, especially, IME) a preponderance of "title-pawn" companies that are set up to steal the assets of people who might have to ditch things of value to provide for their families before they are deployed overseas. There is a whole industry built around exploiting the members of our armed services. Do you not know this?
Can you substantiate your assertion that a preponderance of "title-pawn" companies are set up to steal assets of people? Should be easy, since you're so shocked that someone could "not know" that.
 
  • #64
turbo-1 said:
Have you ever been to cities that are dominated by military facilities? If so, you will know that that these business are established to suck money out of out of our military personnel. You will also see (in the deep south, especially, IME) a preponderance of "title-pawn" companies that are set up to steal the assets of people who might have to ditch things of value to provide for their families before they are deployed overseas. There is a whole industry built around exploiting the members of our armed services. Do you not know this?

Are they not also living paycheck to paycheck - as I indicated?

The (nationwide) business model is not designed specifically to prey on military personnel - they are thriving in non-military areas. However, I am aware of the activities you've described.
 
  • #65
WhoWee said:
I am aware of the activities you've described.

The paycheck loans and pawn shops are 2 completely different business models. While both are banking alteratives, they are regulated differently.

The paycheck shops typically advance funds (either at a discount or for a fee) against a verifiable income stream or a single check. These shops routinely offer bill pay services, discount money orders, and possibly pre-paid cards.

The pawn shops are typically regulated on a municipal level and monitored closely by law enforcement. The pawn shop normally offers 2 options 1.) loan against an asset, or 2.) purchase the asset. When a loan is desired, they asset must be valued (gold is weighed, diamonds verified, computers, electronics, tools, bicycles, sporting equipment (items without titles) are compared to free market trading prices. This process can be time conssuming and has potential risk. Pawn shops want repe3 business on the exact same items and try to loan smaller amounts (weekly or monthly) on the items. Fees include the state mandated interest rate plus transaction fees - a $10 loan on a $150 watch might cost $13.50 to reclaim. If the item goes unclaimed (varies by area) 6 months - the shop is permitted to follow an approved protocol to sell the items - typically via auction.

When a pawn shop purchases an asset in the initial transaction (rules vary by location) they typically offer more than they would for a loan - perhaps 3 to 4 times as much. However, it is common practice for local rules to stipulate the items be held for a specific time (and items reviewed by law enforcement) before being resold.

Assets with a title (cars, motorcycles, boats, and airplanes) may require additional licenses.
 
  • #66
Al68 said:
Can you substantiate your assertion that a preponderance of "title-pawn" companies are set up to steal assets of people? Should be easy, since you're so shocked that someone could "not know" that.
I have not seen a single title-pawn establishment that is not near a military base, and didn't know that such establishments even existed until I saw an array of signs near a military base and asked my project manager (ex-Navy) about them.

That doesn't mean that they don't exist in areas away from military bases, and they probably do, but they are very heavily concentrated around large bases. They are perfectly situated to confiscate assets on the titles that they hold when military personnel are transferred or deployed on short notice, and don't have the time or resources to repay the pawn and recover their titles. Judging from the concentration of title-pawn shops near some large bases, it must be a very profitable business-model. They are VERY prevalent in Georgia, which allows them to charge up to 300% APR.

http://www.georgiawatch.org/2009/05/20/title-pawn-loans/#more-207
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #67
The recent restrictions placed on lenders by the Financial Reform Act last July have made credit cards more difficult to obtain, http://chicagobreakingbusiness.com/2010/08/credit-card-rates-hit-highest-level-in-9-years.html", and are of course partly responsible for the increasing use of pay day and pawn shop credit as the logical next step to supply demand. Make no mistake, the US government has made this happen. Next maybe we'll see the cries of "exploitation" about them also leading to similar restrictions, to likewise "protect the consumer", bringing back the days of the loan shark and their %1000APR and more interesting collection methods.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #68
turbo-1 said:
Judging from the concentration of title-pawn shops near some large bases, it must be a very profitable business-model. They are VERY prevalent in Georgia, which allows them to charge up to 300% APR.

In the 1990's, I managed a consulting project analyzing the potential for, and logistics of, consolidation in the pawn industry. My clients were looking for a franchise vehicle and needed a comprehensive evaluation for their business plan. At the time, we determined that well established pawn shops were very successful. The model was more complicated than just loaning money (most small shops kept a minimum of $250,000 on the street) - and turned it every 10 to 20 days.. The business model also included purchasing "scrap" jewelry. There is no such thing as "new" gold or diamonds (newly mined yes- new no). For example, a pawn shop might purchase a worn gold ring with a diamond setting. They purchase based on a slight discount of the current wholesale scrap rate (2 to 10 percent) and remove the diamond. The gold is accumulated and sold to a smelter/re-manufacturer of (new) jewelry. The diamonds are sorted and made available to the diamond market - or placed in "new" pieces and sold as new - by everyone from discounters to the finest shops. The retail mark-up (mall) is about 1,000 percent.

The title-pawns were relatively new in the 90's. The most successful were in FL - where the APR was about 360 percent - NY by comparison only about 30 percent plus roughly 10 percent handling charge at time of initial transaction.

The low end title-pawn model was in direct competition with small car dealers. The high end/exotic cars, boats, airplanes were very lucrative.
 
  • #69
The argument that "I see payday loans near military bases, and therefore there is a correlation" is exactly the same argument Halton Arp makes about quasars being near local galaxies. With exactly the same problems.

Indeed, at least some companies are leaving that market.

First Cash Financial Services said:
For example, during 2006, the United States Congress enacted legislation that capped the annual percentage rate charged on short-term/payday advance loans made to active military personnel at 36%; this legislation became effective in October 2007. The Company does not have, nor does it intend to develop, any short-term/payday loan or credit services products bearing an effective interest and fee rate of 36% per annum or less, as the Company believes the losses and servicing costs associated with lending to the Company’s traditional customer base would exceed the revenue produced at that rate. As a result, the Company does not have a loan product to offer active military personnel.

This is actually a sore point, as military families who used to rely on payday loans are now "relying" on overdraft fees. This is even more financially burdensome. Despite what seems to be the view of these regulators, people are not stupid. They are selecting the least bad of a number of bad options. When that one is removed for them, they have to move to one that is worse.


I looked at Advance America's 10-K (you know, I am surprised at how few people look at them. People talk about how much corporations 'must be making' and the information is right there to be had on the internet. Last year, their average fee was $55 on a $339 loan. Their average profit (a different thing than mark-up) per loan was $5. So if they are regulated to charging smaller fees by 9%, they can no longer make money and will either leave the market (see aove) or go bankrupt. One reason these loans are risky is that they have a default rate of over 4%.
 
  • #70
Vanadium 50 said:
The argument that "I see payday loans near military bases, and therefore there is a correlation" is exactly the same argument Halton Arp makes about quasars being near local galaxies. With exactly the same problems.
There is a BIG difference. When high-interest loan business ring practically every military base, it's hard to argue "chance projection". The military recognizes this as a problem and warns service-people and veterans about avoiding them.

http://www.fortbraggmwr.com/acs/privorgs/Solicitation%20Information%20for%20Website/Military%20Scams.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #71
turbo-1 said:
There is a BIG difference. When high-interest loan business ring practically every military base, it's hard to argue "chance projection". The military recognizes this as a problem and warns service-people and veterans about avoiding them.

http://www.fortbraggmwr.com/acs/privorgs/Solicitation%20Information%20for%20Website/Military%20Scams.pdf
The problem is a government that makes these lendors the last resort.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #72
I am 40 miles from the nearest military base. According to Google Maps, there are 9 payday loan places within 7 miles of me, with the nearest one being 1.3 miles away. There are also 9 payday loan places within 7 miles of the nearest base, with the nearest one being 1.4 miles away.

The same mistake as Halton Arp. If you look only near galaxies, you only find QSO's near galaxies.
 
  • #73
Just google on "predatory lending" and "military". You'll get so many hits, it will take days to read them. It's a real problem.

(3). Predatory lenders market to the military through their ubiquitous presence
around military installations and/or through the use of terms to affiliate
themselves with the military. Increasingly the Internet is used to promote loans
to Service members.

http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/report_to_congress_final.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #74
turbo-1 said:
I have not seen a single title-pawn establishment that is not near a military base

Title- and paycheck-loan shops are ubiquitous here in South Carolina, including my small rural city which is 60+ miles from the nearest military base (Fort Jackson outside Columbia). Like most other rural towns in SC, we have a lot of people who live from paycheck to paycheck and sometimes come up short. The local TV stations run lots of commercials for these companies, especially late at night (e.g. the reruns of "Star Trek: The Next Generation" which I automatically record at 2 AM to watch the next day).

[added: Google shows three hits for "payday loan" in my town of 10,000. I walked past two of them yesterday, a block apart, and I remember the other one which is in a different part of town.]
 
Last edited:
  • #75
Let's take two similar cities: Junction City, KS, population 45000 (including Fort Riley, which is about 60% of that) and Salina, KS, with a similar population but no military base, located 50 miles west. Junction City has 9 payday loan establishments. Salina has 8.
 
  • #76
jtbell said:
Title- and paycheck-loan shops are ubiquitous here in South Carolina, including my small rural city which is 60+ miles from the nearest military base (Fort Jackson outside Columbia). Like most other rural towns in SC, we have a lot of people who live from paycheck to paycheck and sometimes come up short. The local TV stations run lots of commercials for these companies, especially late at night (e.g. the reruns of "Star Trek: The Next Generation" which I automatically record at 2 AM to watch the next day).
I understand. Maine is extremely rural and poor, and we have no shortage of pawn shops, rent-to-own shops etc. Still, I had never seen a title-pawn shop until I got down south, and found tons of them around military bases. The two documents that I linked above (both from government sources) indicate that the military is concerned about the effects of predatory lending practices on security and military readiness. Not good.
 
  • #77
Payday loan places are everywhere here, to say that they are more prevalent around military bases is nonsense. They are prevalent where there is a population that needs them. Most times, the fee they ask is much less than the penalties, fees, and time and troble they help to avoid.

Late on rent & won't get paind for a week and a half. You can get a payday loan for $500 for two weeks for a fee of $75. Being 6 days late on rent $250 penalty. Which is cheaper?

Car getting repossessed? Same $75 fee and you keep your car. I have no idea how much it would cost you in penalties to get your car back (if you even can), but I'm sure it's hundreds of dollars.

turbo-1 said:
I understand. Maine is extremely rural and poor, and we have no shortage of pawn shops, rent-to-own shops etc. Still, I had never seen a title-pawn shop until I got down south, and found tons of them around military bases. The two documents that I linked above (both from government sources) indicate that the military is concerned about the effects of predatory lending practices on security and military readiness. Not good.
Sorry, but DUH, do you think the military would be happy that their servicement can't handle their finances?

Title loans and pawn shop commercials fill the late night tv here and we don't have military.
 
  • #78
Evo said:
Payday loan places are everywhere here, to say that they are more prevalent around military bases is nonsense. They are prevalent where there is a population that needs them. Most times, the fee they ask is much less than the penalties, fees, and time and troble they help to avoid.

Late on rent & won't get paind for a week and a half. You can get a payday loan for $500 for two weeks for a fee of $75. Being 6 days late on rent $250 penalty. Which is cheaper?

Car getting repossessed? Same $75 fee and you keep your car. I have no idea how much it would cost you in penalties to get your car back (if you even can), but I'm sure it's hundreds of dollars.

Sorry, but DUH, do you think the military would be happy that their servicement can't handle their finances?

Title loans and pawn shop commercials fill the late night tv here and we don't have military.
I never said that such businesses don't exist apart from the military bases.

turbo-1 said:
That doesn't mean that they don't exist in areas away from military bases, and they probably do, but they are very heavily concentrated around large bases. They are perfectly situated to confiscate assets on the titles that they hold when military personnel are transferred or deployed on short notice, and don't have the time or resources to repay the pawn and recover their titles. Judging from the concentration of title-pawn shops near some large bases, it must be a very profitable business-model. They are VERY prevalent in Georgia, which allows them to charge up to 300% APR.

It really shocked me to approach the main gates of a large military base, and find the access road lined with such businesses. The guy who managed my training projects for GP is an ex-Navy sub officer, and he explained to me what a title-pawn business was. I never had seen one before. Basically, anything that is paid for and is properly titled can be used for collateral on a loan for a small fraction of the value of the item (generally cars, motorcycles, etc). Naval personnel on boomers are subject to deployment on short notice and for unknown duration, so reliance on such predatory lenders was highly discouraged.
 
  • #79
turbo-1 said:
I never said that such businesses don't exist apart from the military bases.

What you said is that the businesses were "established to suck money out of out of our military personnel" and "There is a whole industry built around exploiting the members of our armed services."

turbo-1 said:
Have you ever been to cities that are dominated by military facilities? If so, you will know that that these business are established to suck money out of out of our military personnel. You will also see (in the deep south, especially, IME) a preponderance of "title-pawn" companies that are set up to steal the assets of people who might have to ditch things of value to provide for their families before they are deployed overseas. There is a whole industry built around exploiting the members of our armed services. Do you not know this?

If things are as you say, why are these companies building so many stores away from military bases? Are they just stupid?
 
  • #80
Vanadium 50 said:
If things are as you say, why are these companies building so many stores away from military bases? Are they just stupid?
These companies are designed to make profits from poor people. Our military does not pay well, and signing bonuses encourage military personnel to over-extend and get deeply into debt, so these companies cluster around military bases to prey on our service-people. Is this a great mystery? What motivates such nay-saying in the face of so many government studies to the contrary?

My former sub-service-co-worker was very emphatic about the need for active-duty personnel to avoid that crap. Smart guy with several engineering specialties who might have been deployed about any time with NO expectation of return-time.
 
  • #81
turbo-1 said:
These companies are designed to make profits from poor people.
And as I pointed out they can save poor people a ton of money.

What does any of this have to do with the thread topic?

No more off topic posts, back to thread or closed.
 
  • #82
turbo, i think you're barking up the wrong tree with the usury services. they prey on the poor and are all over the place in birmingham with no military in sight (closest i know offhand is anniston, and a lot of those are retirees that like buying cheap crap at base stores).

it's just that the military folk are kept artificially poor, and much of this is because for all our capitalist rhetoric, we like to keep a socialist (perhaps commie?) army. what do you suppose the actual going rate would be for a fighter pilot in a truly capitalist system? paid like a CEO maybe?
 
  • #83
Evo said:
And as I pointed out they can save poor people a ton of money.

What does any of this have to do with the thread topic?

No more off topic posts, back to thread or closed.

Care to split into a new thread?

Back on topic, I'm starting to wade through the "green" tax incentives for 2011 - every investment proposal I read feels like the old depreciation-dependent tax shelters. Experience tells me a project must have positive cash flow on it's own - without subsidy, uncertain future funding options, or tax credits - can't find any though. For me, 2011 is about (business model) re-tooling and moving forward - tax planning plays a big part - finding a lot of uncertainty.
 
  • #84
Proton Soup said:
...it's just that the military folk are kept artificially poor, and much of this is because for all our capitalist rhetoric, we like to keep a socialist (perhaps commie?) army.
I think you're using the word socialist (and commie) rather differently than most. It's socialist for government to use force to restrict or interfere (as a third party) with private transactions, not for government to exercise control over its own transactions, that it is a party to. For military employment, or any government employment, government is a party to the transaction, not an interfering third party.

And (assuming a volunteer force) the terms of the contract are mutually agreed on by all parties to it, which makes it decidedly non-socialist.
 
  • #85
Wow my comment on title and payday loans kicked up a firestorm...

I mentioned it for this reason- only fiscally irresponsible individuals utilize them! The resulting interest rates they charge can be in the range of 1000% APR or higher (even credit cards rarely go above 40%)! Their services are largely aimed at people who are a) already in a bad spot financially and can't afford the consequences of failure to pay, and b) tend to be located in poorer areas. The correlation is there- they prey on people with little to no fiscal responsibility who didn't budget and have an "unexpected" bill come up.

I took a financial planning class with my wife and some friends about a year ago- it was a real eye-opener in terms of how irresponsible people are with their own money (including myself)! The class's teacher put it this way (paraphrased): "If most people were being employed as an accountant to handle their own finances, they would have been fired long ago. Little to no documentation, no future planning, overdrafts, credit cards with outrageous intereste rates... it's a disaster!" This goes into my statement that "poor" people tend to be fiscally irresponsible, while rich people tend to be fiscally responsible; if you save money, live within your means, and don't use credit cards/financing, you end up "rich." It's a miracle!

The "american dream" these days (to my disgust and probably our eventual downfall) is "how much debt can be leveraged with my income" rather than "how much money can I save with my income." People shop for a car based on what the monthly payment will be, rather than the total cost of the vehicle after it's paid off; it's the same with houses. Until you're using 90% of your income to pay for the minimum loan payments on your two cars, house, entertainment system, kitchen appliances, 4 credit cards etc. etc. it doesn't hit you; and once it does your income is stretched so thin you're barely staying afloat. No saved money for an emergency fund, no medical savings. One small hiccup and you're sunk.

The same will happen with the government- we're leveraging debt based on our income, but the bills are starting to take a not insignificant portion of it. Unless we do something about it, the entire country will go into bankruptcy like an individual that overleveraged themselves.
 
  • #86
Evo said:
And as I pointed out they can save poor people a ton of money.

You know what would save them more money? Proper budgeting! If a bill of $300 is a threat- maybe you should ask yourself why you didn't see it coming!
 
  • #87
Mech_Engineer said:
I mentioned it for this reason- only fiscally irresponsible individuals utilize them! The resulting interest rates they charge can be in the range of 1000% APR or higher (even credit cards rarely go above 40%)!
They're definitely not cheap, but it's pretty silly to list their fees in terms of "APR", for a loan for just a few days. Very little of that fee is analogous to interest.

Including lender fees in a quoted APR just doesn't make sense when the lender fee is the bulk of the total.

As far as terms like "prey" and "steal", it's a mutually voluntary transaction between adults. The person getting the loan has determined that the transaction is beneficial to him. Nobody else's opinion matters in a free society, unless that person is a child, or treated as a child due to mental disability, or if force or fraud is involved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #88
Mech_Engineer said:
The "american dream" these days (to my disgust and probably our eventual downfall) is "how much debt can be leveraged with my income" rather than "how much money can I save with my income." People shop for a car based on what the monthly payment will be, rather than the total cost of the vehicle after it's paid off; it's the same with houses. Until you're using 90% of your income to pay for the minimum loan payments on your two cars, house, entertainment system, kitchen appliances, 4 credit cards etc. etc. it doesn't hit you; and once it does your income is stretched so thin you're barely staying afloat. No saved money for an emergency fund, no medical savings. One small hiccup and you're sunk.

The same will happen with the government- we're leveraging debt based on our income, but the bills are starting to take a not insignificant portion of it. Unless we do something about it, the entire country will go into bankruptcy like an individual that overleveraged themselves.

IMO - this summarizes our current situation. When the Recession hit, Government revenues fell - the response was to increase spending to record highs. Now, the spending is increased, more borrowing is required, and Government revenues are still lower than previous years.

The only way to cover this gap is to cut spending and raise taxes. The longer the gap widens - the more people tat will ultimately face large tax increases - again IMO.
 
  • #89
Al68 said:
They're definitely not cheap, but it's pretty silly to list their fees in terms of "APR", for a loan for just a few days. Very little of that fee is analogous to interest.

Including lender fees in a quoted APR just doesn't make sense when the lender fee is the bulk of the total.

You might be right, but it's a fair comparison if only to show what the fees are compared to a credit card or personal bank loan. Ironically, these loans should be relatively low-risk to the company because they demand collateral for the loan (hence the term, "car title loan") but the net interest rate charged rivals a loan shark...

Al68 said:
As far as terms like "prey" and "steal", it's a mutually voluntary transaction between adults. The person getting the loan has determined that the transaction is beneficial to him. Nobody else's opinion matters in a free society, unless that person is a child, or treated as a child due to mental disability, or if force or fraud is involved.

You're right, it's a mutual transaction and you should have the right to do whatever you want. Problem is, it's poor (a.k.a. fiscally irresponsible) people that partake in these transactions, and then wonder why they're poor and want ME to give them money (via government taxes) to help them out. If you want the right to deal in transactions of your choosing, you need to also accept the responsibility of dealing with the consequences of such fiscal policy.

No one gets rich by taking out a car title loan.

WhoWee said:
The only way to cover this gap is to cut spending and raise taxes. The longer the gap widens - the more people tat will ultimately face large tax increases - again IMO.

You're assuming of course that a tax raise will increase federal income- which IMO isn't proven (in fact it appears to currently be the opposite).
 
  • #90
Mech_Engineer said:
You're assuming of course that a tax raise will increase federal income- which IMO isn't proven (in fact it appears to currently be the opposite).

I'm in favor of EVERYONE paying a little more IF the spending is cut (everyone take a little less also) - no more EITC either.
 
  • #91
WhoWee said:
I'm in favor of EVERYONE paying a little more IF the spending is cut (everyone take a little less also) - no more EITC either.

I'm in favor of everyone paying a share as well. Not so much to increase the federal income, as to change the political voting landscape back to one of "leaving money in your pocket" rather than "putting money in your pocket."
 
  • #92
Al68 said:
I think you're using the word socialist (and commie) rather differently than most. It's socialist for government to use force to restrict or interfere (as a third party) with private transactions, not for government to exercise control over its own transactions, that it is a party to. For military employment, or any government employment, government is a party to the transaction, not an interfering third party.

And (assuming a volunteer force) the terms of the contract are mutually agreed on by all parties to it, which makes it decidedly non-socialist.

i find this very interesting. because it implies that nationalizing military contractors is not socialist. and neither would be nationalizing companies that provide any other government services. i wonder how much of the economy that would account for? quite a bit of construction and manufacturing to be sure. even automobile manufacturing.

Vanadium 50 said:
I've split this off to its own thread.

Is the tax system popular? It's fair to say its more popular with the 47% of the population that's paying no income tax than the 1% of the population that pays 35% of the income tax.

i find all of this pointless and misleading. it's a big distraction to set up artificial feuds among the sheep. in the end, all the tax is paid by the end consumer. for that 1% to make enough profit to pay 35% of the tax, they must add enough to the price of goods to extract that cost from the consumer.

i think our individual income tax system is the most silly, asinine, inefficient means of collecting revenue we could have devised. individuals are not CPAs, and not equipped for it. however, businesses are. they already have specialists in place because their size requires it. we should consider moving all revenue to one place. and maybe you would even consider not taxing businesses that only provide services (that would also account for a lot of "individuals" who are also a business). rather, just hit people where they live and tax them for the products they consume. sure, rich and poor alike have to eat, but so what? the rich consume more. much more. the system would still be progressive. and to avoid tax, the rich could consume less and invest more, creating jobs. and if you're a "greenie", what is more green than a system that discourages waste?
 
  • #93
I like the idea of completely replacing the individual federal income tax with a direct federal tax on the state governments, so that the federal government only taxes the individual indirectly, as opposed to the other way around the way as it is now. This should have the effect of greatly simplifying the tax code as seen by an individual, and allowing the abolition of the IRS while slightly expanding state collection staff. In general the federal government should be relegated to performing tasks that only it can do, and leaving the rest to the states and local governments.

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=YzVlNjA3NzE5ODk0NWYwYWY2NGU4YjM1ZDBiMjk5MTI=
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #94
Proton Soup said:
i find this very interesting. because it implies that nationalizing military contractors is not socialist. and neither would be nationalizing companies that provide any other government services.
Assuming you're referring to government hiring people directly instead of contracting with a private company, that's right. Government choosing not to do business with a private company isn't socialist.

If a private company's only customer is government, they would effectively cease to exist, and their employees may end up working for government instead of the private company.

But in that case, no force is used by government to restrict or interfere with any private transaction. It's no different from me deciding to grow my own tomatoes instead of buying them from the grocer.
 
  • #95
Mech_Engineer said:
I'm in favor of everyone paying a share as well. Not so much to increase the federal income, as to change the political voting landscape back to one of "leaving money in your pocket" rather than "putting money in your pocket."

(Bold mine). This is one of the things I was trying to get at. Why isn't the system more like that, surely it would be simpler and cheaper to implement.
 
  • #96
cobalt124 said:
(Bold mine). This is one of the things I was trying to get at. Why isn't the system more like that, surely it would be simpler and cheaper to implement.

It's hard to talk 100 million people into paying taxes when they're used to not paying any. Ironically, they're fine with everyone else paying taxes for them though...
 
  • #97
mheslep said:
I like the idea of completely replacing the individual federal income tax with a direct federal tax on the state governments, so that the federal government only taxes the individual indirectly, as opposed to the other way around the way as it is now. This should have the effect of greatly simplifying the tax code as seen by an individual, and allowing the abolition of the IRS while slightly expanding state collection staff. In general the federal government should be relegated to performing tasks that only it can do, and leaving the rest to the states and local governments.

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=YzVlNjA3NzE5ODk0NWYwYWY2NGU4YjM1ZDBiMjk5MTI=

Whats the difference of taxing the individual through the federal government, or taxing the individual through the states for the federal government? I think a national sales tax would be the best. If one chooses to buy stuff, one chooses to pay taxes on that stuff. It is basically the way the US government was originally financed, through tariffs, with no individual tax per se.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #98
Jasongreat said:
Whats the difference of taxing the individual through the federal government, or taxing the individual through the states for the federal government?

It makes the federal government more responsive to the states. Whether this a good thing or a bad thing is a matter of opinion.
 
  • #99
Vanadium 50 said:
It makes the federal government more responsive to the states. Whether this a good thing or a bad thing is a matter of opinion.

If the states were able to make the Feds more accountable - instead of Federal mandates telling the states what to do - it might be a good thing? The problem is accountability - nobody (Dem or Repub) owns the problem of deficit spending.

On the morning news I heard a Democrat strategist comment that seats were lost in the House due to legislative gridlock (?) - apparently the Dems couldn't pass any legislation and were punished for it?

How would you feel if PF leaders decided to make a giant advertising push to increase membership, paid consultants to revise the look of PF, and hired hundreds of workers to monitor threads - then notify all members of a need for more revenues - perhaps a pay per post fee - and instead of a discount for the most active members - the rate would increase with activity?
 
  • #100
Vanadium 50 said:
It makes the federal government more responsive to the states. Whether this a good thing or a bad thing is a matter of opinion.
Exactly. And for the individual, he/she does not have to deal with a leviathon one size fits all nation wide tax system. The state income tax systems are, visibly, simpler for the individual.
 

Similar threads

News Reveal UK's Official Sharia Courts: What's Going On?
Replies
10
Views
4K
News Surprise from the US Supreme Court on same-sex marriage
Replies
21
Views
3K
News Shows how much of a laughing stock the UK's justice system is
Replies
13
Views
4K
News Public opinion regarding US Gun laws.
2
Replies
50
Views
9K
News Court: Obama Administration Flouting the law
Replies
24
Views
9K
News Indiana Court says police can enter homes without warrant?
2
Replies
62
Views
11K
News Is the UK's Detention of Terrorism Suspects Without Trial Illegal?
Replies
5
Views
3K
News Assuming Affordable Care Act Is Shot Down, Should There Be a Healthcare Hospital Tax?
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
News What Are Payroll Tax Supported Programs to You?
2
Replies
69
Views
10K
News Who Will Replace Justice Stevens on the U.S. Supreme Court?
Replies
10
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top