Evaluate (1-x^3)^-1/3 from 0 to 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter jack5322
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the integral of (1-x^3)^(-1/3) from 0 to 1, addressing the complexities of branch cuts and contour integration. Participants explore how to divide the integral into three separate contours while ensuring the branch cuts do not intersect the contours, allowing for analytical continuation. The choice of branch cuts and their implications on phase factors during integration are emphasized, particularly how crossing these cuts affects the function's value. The conversation also touches on the conditions under which multiple real answers might arise and how to select the appropriate branch for calculations. Overall, the thread provides insights into contour integration techniques and the importance of defining branch cuts correctly.
  • #31
I still don't see why the residue are negatives for the example with the 2pi on top. I get negative 2I = 2pi*i residues, where the residues are from the positive sqrt z/z^2+1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
why is it that we choose the negative sqrt if the 2pi is on top?
 
  • #33
jack5322 said:
why is it that we choose the negative sqrt if the 2pi is on top?

You don't have to. Do it differently and see what happens.
 
  • #34
I know I don't have to, but I need to see that It's possible that we can do this. It will make sense If I can do this, because If the choice from 2pi can be shifted to the bottom then Ill see why we can manipulate how the cuts phases can be changed. Also If we shift the 2pi to the top, the zero is on the bottom right?
 
  • #35
I think I know now, we take the residues from the integral in the positive orientation, i.e. the one going from zero to infinity! That makes sense now.
 
  • #36
Actually that doesn't work. My question is this: Why is it that we calculate the residues from the negative square root if the 2pi is on top?
 
  • #37
jack5322 said:
Actually that doesn't work. My question is this: Why is it that we calculate the residues from the negative square root if the 2pi is on top?

In that case the polar angle goes from 2pi to 4 pi. When comnputing the residue, you have to evaluate a square root of some complex number. You write it in polar form, but then the angle will be between 2 pi and 4 pi.
 
  • #38
ok, why is it that the 2pi is on the top and the zero on the bottom for the example of something like (1-z)^-1/2 for -1<x<1 but the 2pi is on the bottom for the sqrtz with 0<x<infinity and zeroon the top?
 
  • #39
jack5322 said:
ok, why is it that the 2pi is on the top and the zero on the bottom for the example of something like (1-z)^-1/2 for -1<x<1 but the 2pi is on the bottom for the sqrtz with 0<x<infinity and zeroon the top?

If you have 1-z, then the line theta = 0 moves from z = 1 in te direction of z = 0. This is because you have to use the polar representation of 1-z. This is the only relevant difference between the two cases.
 
  • #40
following this logic, wouldn't the 8pi/3 be on the left of the cut for the MB contour, the one going out to the left? If not, why?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
612
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K