MHB Evaluate 19q + 99p: 2x^3-8x^2+9x+p=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the expression 19q + 99p, where p and q are derived from two cubic equations sharing two common roots. Using Vieta's relations, it is established that the roots lead to p = -9 and q = 15. Substituting these values into the expression results in 19q + 99p = -606. Participants acknowledge the effectiveness of the solutions provided, with some noting the problem's lack of depth. The final consensus is that the calculations confirm the result of -606.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Two of the roots of the equation $$2x^3-8x^2+9x+p=0$$ are also roots of the equation $$2x^3+8x^2-7x+q=0$$. Evaluate $$19q+99p$$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Evaluate 19q+99p

anemone said:
Two of the roots of the equation $$2x^3-8x^2+9x+p=0$$ are also roots of the equation $$2x^3+8x^2-7x+q=0$$. Evaluate $$19q+99p$$.
Use Vieta's relations. The sum of the roots of the first equation is $4$, and the sum of the roots of the second equation is $-4$. So if the roots of the first equation are $\alpha,\ \beta$ and $\gamma$, then the roots of the second equation are $\alpha,\ \beta$ and $\gamma-8$. Vieta's relations tell us that
$$\alpha\beta + \beta\gamma + \gamma\alpha = 9/2,\qquad \alpha\beta + (\alpha+\beta)(\gamma-8) = -7/2.$$ Therefore $-\frac72 = \frac92 - 8(\alpha+\beta)$, from which $\alpha+\beta = 1$. But $\alpha + \beta + \gamma = 4$, and so $\gamma=3$ (and $\gamma-8 = -5$).

Putting $x=3$ as a solution to the first equation, you find that $p=-9$; and putting $x=-5$ as a solution to the second equation, you find that $q=15$.

You can then find $19q + 99p = -606$ but that seems a bit pointless.
 
Re: Evaluate 19q+99p

I thought the same but my way was a little longer. There must be a clever way at getting to the answer.
 
Re: Evaluate 19q+99p

Hmm...now that I see how Opalg approached the problem, I have to admit that this problem serves little purpose and is a weak problem.

Hi Jester, I think what Opalg has given here is the smartest and shortest solution but having said this, I will also show my solution in this post.

Let a, b, and m be the roots of the equation $$2x^3-8x^2+9x+p=0$$ and a, b and k be the roots of the equation $$2x^3+8x^2-7x+q=0$$.

We see that the sum of the roots for both equations are:

$$a+b+m=4$$

$$a+b+k=-4$$

Subtracting the second equation from the first equation, we obtain:

$$m-k=8$$

and the product of the roots for both equations are:

$$abm=-\frac{p}{2}$$, $$abk=-\frac{q}{2}$$

Dividing these two equations, we obtain:

$$\frac{m}{k}=\frac{p}{q}$$

By Newton Identities, we have:

$$(a^2+b^2+m^2)(2)+(-8)(4)+2(9)=0\implies a^2+b^2+m^2=7$$

$$(a^2+b^2+k^2)(2)+(8)(-4)+2(-7)=0\implies a^2+b^2+k^2=23$$

Subtracting these two equations yields:

$$k^2-m^2=16$$

$$(k+m)(k-m)=16$$

$$(k+m)(-8)=16$$

$$m+k=-2$$

Solving the equations $m+k=-2$ and $m-k=8$ for both $m$ and $k$, we get $m=3$ and $k=-5$.

When $m=3$, $$a+b+3=4\implies a+b=1$$

Substituting $m=3,\,k=-5,\,a+b=1$ back into the equations $$a^2+b^2+m^2=7$$, $$abm=-\frac{p}{2}$$ and $$abk=-\frac{q}{2}$$, we see that:

$$(a+b)^2-2ab+(3)^2=7$$

$$(1)^2-2ab+(3)^2=7$$

$$ab=\frac{3}{2}$$

Hence, $$\frac{3}{2}(3)=-\frac{p}{2}\implies p=-9$$ and $$\frac{3}{2}(-5)=-\frac{q}{2}\implies q=15$$.

And this gives $$19q+99p=19(15)+99(-9)=-606$$
 
Re: Evaluate 19q+99p

I must applaud you for posting your solution...I know from experience that it can be daunting to post a solution when others have shown a shorter or more clever route. (Sun)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top