MHB Evaluate 3/7 r + 5/8 s when r = 14 and s = 8

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobisaka
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To evaluate the expression 3/7 r + 5/8 s with r = 14 and s = 8, the correct approach is to treat it as (3/7) * r + (5/8) * s. This means calculating (3/7) * 14, which simplifies to 6, and (5/8) * 8, which equals 5. The final result is 6 + 5, totaling 11. The confusion arose from misinterpreting the notation, where spaces indicate multiplication rather than division. Proper notation is essential to avoid ambiguity in mathematical expressions.
bobisaka
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm currently on khan academy and am stuck at solving the following question. I try to use the 'multiply fraction by whole number' solution, however the correct solution is different. What is the correct way to solving this?

3/7 r + 5/8 s when r = 14 and s = 8

The way i solve it leads me to: 3/98 + 5/8
(using this process 3/7 * 14/1 = 3/7 * 1/14 = 3/98 )
However the correct solution is: 3/7(14) + 5/8(8)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to the forum.

bobisaka said:
using this process 3/7 * 14/1 = 3/7 * 1/14 = 3/98
You cannot simply change 14/1 to 1/14.

When you have a sequence of multiplications and divisions with no parentheses, they should be evaluated left-to-right. So $3/7r$ means $(3/7)\cdot r=3r/7$. Therefore,
\[
\frac37\cdot\frac{14}{1}+\frac58\cdot\frac81=3\cdot2+5=11.
\]

Edit: In fact $3/7r$ does look confusing and I understand people who take it for $3/(7r)$. Therefore, such notation should be avoided by using fractions like $$\frac37\cdot r$$ or parentheses. Nevertheless, this does not change the rule: a sequence of multiplications and divisions is evaluated left-to-right.
 
bobisaka said:
Hi all,

I'm currently on khan academy and am stuck at solving the following question. I try to use the 'multiply fraction by whole number' solution, however the correct solution is different. What is the correct way to solving this?

3/7 r + 5/8 s when r = 14 and s = 8
Notice the space between the "7" and the "r" and the space between the "8" and the "s". That indicates that this is the fraction 3/7 times the number r and the fraction 5/8 times the number s. With r= 14, 3/7 times 14 is the same as \frac{3}{7}\frac{14}{1}= \frac{42}{7}= 6 or \frac{3}{7}14= 3\frac{14}{7}= 3(2)= 6. And with s= 8, 5/8 times 8 is \frac{5}{8}8= 5\frac{8}{8}. The result is 6+ 5= 11.<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> The way i solve it leads me to: 3/98 + 5/8<br /> (using this process 3/7 * 14/1 = 3/7 * 1/14 = 3/98 ) </div> </div> </blockquote> That is peculiar! I had thought you were interpreting &quot;3/7 r&quot; as &quot;3/7r&quot; where there is no space and so means \frac{3}{7r} (which is why writing fractions &quot;in line&quot; as &quot;3/7&quot; rather that &quot;\frac{3}{7}&quot; tends to be ambiguous). But why in the world would you think that &quot;<div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">3/7 * 14/1 = 3/7 * 1/14&quot;? <b>Multiplying</b> by a/b is NOT <b>multiplying</b> by b/a because a/b and b/a are not the same thing. Perhaps you are remembering a garbled form of &quot;to <b>divide</b> by a fraction invert and <b>multiply</b>. That is \frac{a}{b}\div \frac{c}{d}= \frac{a}{g}\cdot\frac{d}{c}. But that is changing from <b>division</b> to <b>multiplication</b>.</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> However the correct solution is: 3/7(14) + 5/8(8)[/QUOTE]</span>
 
Hi all,

Thanks for the feedback. You stand correct in that I got confused with dividing fraction by whole number.

That clears everything. Thank you.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top