MHB Evaluate 3/7 r + 5/8 s when r = 14 and s = 8

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobisaka
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
To evaluate the expression 3/7 r + 5/8 s with r = 14 and s = 8, the correct approach is to treat it as (3/7) * r + (5/8) * s. This means calculating (3/7) * 14, which simplifies to 6, and (5/8) * 8, which equals 5. The final result is 6 + 5, totaling 11. The confusion arose from misinterpreting the notation, where spaces indicate multiplication rather than division. Proper notation is essential to avoid ambiguity in mathematical expressions.
bobisaka
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm currently on khan academy and am stuck at solving the following question. I try to use the 'multiply fraction by whole number' solution, however the correct solution is different. What is the correct way to solving this?

3/7 r + 5/8 s when r = 14 and s = 8

The way i solve it leads me to: 3/98 + 5/8
(using this process 3/7 * 14/1 = 3/7 * 1/14 = 3/98 )
However the correct solution is: 3/7(14) + 5/8(8)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to the forum.

bobisaka said:
using this process 3/7 * 14/1 = 3/7 * 1/14 = 3/98
You cannot simply change 14/1 to 1/14.

When you have a sequence of multiplications and divisions with no parentheses, they should be evaluated left-to-right. So $3/7r$ means $(3/7)\cdot r=3r/7$. Therefore,
\[
\frac37\cdot\frac{14}{1}+\frac58\cdot\frac81=3\cdot2+5=11.
\]

Edit: In fact $3/7r$ does look confusing and I understand people who take it for $3/(7r)$. Therefore, such notation should be avoided by using fractions like $$\frac37\cdot r$$ or parentheses. Nevertheless, this does not change the rule: a sequence of multiplications and divisions is evaluated left-to-right.
 
bobisaka said:
Hi all,

I'm currently on khan academy and am stuck at solving the following question. I try to use the 'multiply fraction by whole number' solution, however the correct solution is different. What is the correct way to solving this?

3/7 r + 5/8 s when r = 14 and s = 8
Notice the space between the "7" and the "r" and the space between the "8" and the "s". That indicates that this is the fraction 3/7 times the number r and the fraction 5/8 times the number s. With r= 14, 3/7 times 14 is the same as \frac{3}{7}\frac{14}{1}= \frac{42}{7}= 6 or \frac{3}{7}14= 3\frac{14}{7}= 3(2)= 6. And with s= 8, 5/8 times 8 is \frac{5}{8}8= 5\frac{8}{8}. The result is 6+ 5= 11.<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> The way i solve it leads me to: 3/98 + 5/8<br /> (using this process 3/7 * 14/1 = 3/7 * 1/14 = 3/98 ) </div> </div> </blockquote> That is peculiar! I had thought you were interpreting &quot;3/7 r&quot; as &quot;3/7r&quot; where there is no space and so means \frac{3}{7r} (which is why writing fractions &quot;in line&quot; as &quot;3/7&quot; rather that &quot;\frac{3}{7}&quot; tends to be ambiguous). But why in the world would you think that &quot;<div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">3/7 * 14/1 = 3/7 * 1/14&quot;? <b>Multiplying</b> by a/b is NOT <b>multiplying</b> by b/a because a/b and b/a are not the same thing. Perhaps you are remembering a garbled form of &quot;to <b>divide</b> by a fraction invert and <b>multiply</b>. That is \frac{a}{b}\div \frac{c}{d}= \frac{a}{g}\cdot\frac{d}{c}. But that is changing from <b>division</b> to <b>multiplication</b>.</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> However the correct solution is: 3/7(14) + 5/8(8)[/QUOTE]</span>
 
Hi all,

Thanks for the feedback. You stand correct in that I got confused with dividing fraction by whole number.

That clears everything. Thank you.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K