MHB Evaluate Trig Expressions....Part 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Evaluate the trig expressions using the method shown in the textbook. Steps A through C show the method given in the textbook.

1. cos 4π/3

A. We are told to graph cos 4π/3. We are in Quadrant 3.

B. Find the reference number r.

r = 3π/2 - 4π/3

r = π/6

C. Evaluate r.

cos π/6 = -sqrt{3}/2

Book's answer for r is -1/2.

2. sec 4π/3

A. We are told to graph sec 4π/3.
We are in Quadrant 3.

B. Find the reference number r.

r = 3π/2 - 4π/3

r = π/6

C. Evaluate r.

sec π/6 = -2sqrt{3}/3.

Book's answer for r is -2.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$\dfrac{4\pi}{3}$ is in quad III $\implies$ cosine is negative

reference angle is $\dfrac{4\pi}{3} - \pi = \dfrac{\pi}{3} \implies \cos\left(\dfrac{4\pi}{3}\right) = -\cos\left(\dfrac{\pi}{3}\right) = - \dfrac{1}{2}$
 
I will practice more on finding reference angles using the algebraic method you provided in Part 1, I believe. It's a very easy concept but using the graph can be a bit tricky. I prefer using algebra over graphing any time.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top