MHB Evaluate Trig Expressions....Part 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating trigonometric expressions, specifically cos 4π/3 and sec 4π/3, using a method outlined in the textbook. For cos 4π/3, the reference angle is calculated as π/6, leading to a value of -1/2, while the evaluation of sec 4π/3 also results in a reference angle of π/6, yielding -2√3/3. The participants note that both angles are in Quadrant 3, where cosine values are negative. There is a preference expressed for using algebraic methods over graphing for finding reference angles. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding reference angles in trigonometric evaluations.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Evaluate the trig expressions using the method shown in the textbook. Steps A through C show the method given in the textbook.

1. cos 4π/3

A. We are told to graph cos 4π/3. We are in Quadrant 3.

B. Find the reference number r.

r = 3π/2 - 4π/3

r = π/6

C. Evaluate r.

cos π/6 = -sqrt{3}/2

Book's answer for r is -1/2.

2. sec 4π/3

A. We are told to graph sec 4π/3.
We are in Quadrant 3.

B. Find the reference number r.

r = 3π/2 - 4π/3

r = π/6

C. Evaluate r.

sec π/6 = -2sqrt{3}/3.

Book's answer for r is -2.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$\dfrac{4\pi}{3}$ is in quad III $\implies$ cosine is negative

reference angle is $\dfrac{4\pi}{3} - \pi = \dfrac{\pi}{3} \implies \cos\left(\dfrac{4\pi}{3}\right) = -\cos\left(\dfrac{\pi}{3}\right) = - \dfrac{1}{2}$
 
I will practice more on finding reference angles using the algebraic method you provided in Part 1, I believe. It's a very easy concept but using the graph can be a bit tricky. I prefer using algebra over graphing any time.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top