Evaluating Fresnel Integral: sin(x^2) from 0 to $\infty$

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Forny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fresnel Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around evaluating the integral of sin(x^2) from 0 to infinity, specifically relating to the Fresnel integral. Participants explore various methods and strategies for solving this integral, including references to existing literature and mathematical techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about how to evaluate the integral of sin(x^2) from 0 to infinity, expressing a need for clarification on existing strategies.
  • One participant references a Wikipedia link discussing the Fresnel integral and suggests it contains a strategy for evaluation.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the strategy outlined in the link and requests further explanation or alternative resources.
  • A detailed approach is presented involving the use of complex analysis and contour integration, leading to a proposed result that the integral equals sqrt(π/8).
  • Concerns are raised about the limit of a specific integral as R approaches infinity, with one participant questioning why it equals zero.
  • A subsequent reply attempts to justify this limit by evaluating the absolute value of the integral and finding its maximum, but another participant challenges the correctness of this reasoning, claiming the maximum occurs at a different angle.
  • One participant provides a link to an external proof, suggesting it may offer a correct evaluation of the integral.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the evaluation methods and the correctness of certain proofs. There is no consensus on the best approach or the validity of the arguments presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various mathematical techniques, including contour integration and properties of exponential functions, but the discussion remains unresolved regarding the most effective method for evaluating the integral.

Forny
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Somebody could please tell me how to evaluate the integral:

integral(sin(x^2)) from o to infinity
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, I had already checked the link, but I don't undestand the strategy, could somebody please explain it to me?, or if you have a text where I can find some explanation about that kind of process, I would really apreciate if you help me.
 
Forny said:
well, I had already checked the link, but I don't undestand the strategy, could somebody please explain it to me?, or if you have a text where I can find some explanation about that kind of process, I would really apreciate if you help me.

Since [itex]e^{iz^2}[/itex] is an analytic function on [itex]\mathbb{C}[/itex] we have:

[tex]\int_{\Gamma_R} e^{iz^2} d z = 0[/tex] where [itex]\Gamma_R[/itex] is the "pizza-slice" countour given in the link.
Now
[tex]\int_{\Gamma_R} e^{iz^2} d z = \int_0^R e^{i t^2} d t + \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{4}} e^{i R^2 e^{i 2 \theta}} i R e^{i \theta} d \theta + \int_R^0 e^{- t^2} e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}} d t[/tex].

By taking the limit [itex]R \rightarrow \infty[/itex] and observing that

[tex]\lim_{R\rightarrow \infty} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{4}} e^{i R^2 e^{i 2 \theta}} i R e^{i\theta} d \theta = 0[/tex]

we obtain

[tex]\int_0^\infty e^{i t^2} d t = e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}} \int_0^\infty e^{- t^2} d t[/tex].

By Euler's formula and gaussian integral we get:

[tex]\int_0^\infty \sin(t^2) dt = \int_0^\infty \cos(t^2) dt = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{8}}[/tex].
 
Last edited:
Forny said:
Somebody could please tell me how to evaluate the integral:

integral(sin(x^2)) from o to infinity

Because I'm lazy to write all that much, see pages 98 & 99 of Max Planck's "Theory of Light", Macmillan, 1932 (a.k.a. the IV-the volume of the "Introduction to Theoretical Physics" set).


Daniel.
 
Reviving this tread, but why does

[tex]\lim_{R\rightarrow \infty} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{4}} e^{i R^2 e^{i 2 \theta}} i R e^{i\theta} d \theta = 0[/tex]

?
 
This is why:

[tex] \left\arrowvert\int_0^{\pi/4}e^{iR^2e^{i2\theta}}iRe^{i\theta}d\theta \right\arrowvert = \left\arrowvert\int_0^{\pi/4}exp\{iR^2(\cos(2\theta)+i \sin(2\theta))\}iRe^{i\theta}d\theta \right\arrowvert[/tex]

Evaluating the absolute value, this equals

[tex] \int_0^{\pi/4}exp\{-R^2 \sin(2\theta)\}R d\theta[/tex]

Now find the maximum of [tex]g(\theta) = exp\{-R^2 \sin(2\theta)\}[/tex] by differentiation (check it's a max by second derivative test).
This occurs at [tex]\theta = \pi/4[/tex].
Then the above is less than or equal to

[tex] R \cdot exp\{-R^2\} \frac{\pi}{4}[/tex]

Take the limit as [tex]R\to \infty[/tex] to get 0.
Absolute value to zero, original to zero.
 
ZZappaZZappa said:
This is why:

[tex] \left\arrowvert\int_0^{\pi/4}e^{iR^2e^{i2\theta}}iRe^{i\theta}d\theta \right\arrowvert = \left\arrowvert\int_0^{\pi/4}exp\{iR^2(\cos(2\theta)+i \sin(2\theta))\}iRe^{i\theta}d\theta \right\arrowvert[/tex]

Evaluating the absolute value, this equals

[tex] \int_0^{\pi/4}exp\{-R^2 \sin(2\theta)\}R d\theta[/tex]

Now find the maximum of [tex]g(\theta) = exp\{-R^2 \sin(2\theta)\}[/tex] by
differentiation (check it's a max by second derivative test).

This occurs at [tex]\theta = \pi/4[/tex].
Then the above is less than or equal to

[tex] R \cdot exp\{-R^2\} \frac{\pi}{4}[/tex]

Take the limit as [tex]R\to \infty[/tex] to get 0.
Absolute value to zero, original to zero.

Buddy you are wrong the maximum of exp(-R^2sin(2thta)) is not at theta=pi/4 its maximum is at theta=0 ! So The maximum of g(theta) = exp{-R^2 *sin(2*theta)} is 1, not exp(-R^2), and this makes you proof wrong.!
Any other proof that is right?
this is my homework pls
 
Last edited:
here is the right proof:
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/FresnelIntegralsAtInfinity.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K