Undergrad Evaluating Taylor Series at the Mid-Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter thatboi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Taylor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the evaluation of the Taylor Series at the midpoint, specifically addressing the error term of ##\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{3})##. The equation in question is $$f(x+\epsilon n, x) = f(x,x) + \epsilon n^{\mu}\frac{\partial f(x+\epsilon n,x)}{\partial n^{\mu}}\vert_{x+\frac{\epsilon}{2}n} + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{3})$$. Participants clarify that the error arises from the nature of the midpoint method, which is detailed in the linked Wikipedia article on the topic. This highlights the importance of understanding the Taylor expansion's behavior at different points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor Series expansions
  • Familiarity with error analysis in numerical methods
  • Knowledge of the midpoint method in calculus
  • Basic proficiency in partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Taylor Series and their convergence
  • Learn about error analysis techniques in numerical methods
  • Explore the midpoint method in detail, including its applications
  • Review partial derivatives and their role in multivariable calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus, and professionals in numerical analysis who seek to deepen their understanding of Taylor Series and error estimation techniques.

thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
Hi all,
I came across the following stackexchange post and was wondering if anyone could give any elaboration for why the answer claims that evaluating the Taylor Series resulted in ##\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{3})## errors? I have not encountered such an expansion before.
EDIT: The equation at hand is:
$$f(x+\epsilon n, x) = f(x,x) + \epsilon n^{\mu}\frac{\partial f(x+\epsilon n,x)}{\partial n^{\mu}}\vert_{x+\frac{\epsilon}{2}n} + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{3}) $$.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
thatboi said:
Hi all,
I came across the following stackexchange post and was wondering if anyone could give any elaboration for why the answer claims that evaluating the Taylor Series resulted in ##\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{3})## errors? I have not encountered such an expansion before.
To keep PF threads as self-contained as possible, could you post a summary here of the answer you're asking about?
 
renormalize said:
To keep PF threads as self-contained as possible, could you post a summary here of the answer you're asking about?
Ah that is true. I have edited the question.
 
thatboi said:
Ah that is true. I have edited the question.
Thanks. To see why the posted equation has errors of ##\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{3})## rather than ##\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{2})##, take a look at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midpoint_method.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K