Evaluating the Arcsec Integral: Can it be Done?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lude1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating integrals involving arcsec and arcsin functions, specifically focusing on the integral 1/{x[sqrt(1-(x^2))]}dx and its relation to basic integration formulas. Participants are examining the conditions under which these integrals can be evaluated and the implications of domain restrictions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of using arcsec for the given integral and discussing the implications of domain restrictions when manipulating square roots. There is also exploration of substitution methods and the impact of completing the square on the integrals.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the manipulation of square roots and the conditions for using specific integration formulas, but no consensus has been reached on the original problem's evaluation.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints regarding the domains of the functions involved, particularly the square root expressions, which are under scrutiny. Participants are also reflecting on potential errors in their approaches and the accuracy of textbook answers.

lude1
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Can this integral be evaluated using the basic integration formulas?

1/{x[sqrt(1-(x^2))]}dx
Answer in the back of the book: No

Homework Equations


[1/a]arcsecc(|u|/a) + C


The Attempt at a Solution


The reason why it cannot be an arcsec is because for the denominator, it is not the square root of (u^2 - a^2) aka: (x^2) - 1.

Thus, I wanted to take a negative out to make it -(x^2) + 1. Then I would take the negative out of the square root, then place the negative before the integral sign. Then, the answer would be -arcsec.

However, because the answer says I cannot do this problem, that means I did something wrong. However, if I did this example wrong, that means I got two other homework problems wrong. However, compared to the answers in the back of the book, I got the correct answer using this method (pull and negative out).

Therefore, I was wondering - am I doing something wrong, or did the book print a mistake? If I did something wrong, that means I'll need help with my other two homework problems :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The expression sqrt(1-x2) is only defined for x between -1 and 1, assuming you aren't using complex numbers. If you could factor it as you say, your square root would look like sqrt(x2-1) which has domain |x| ≥ 1. Different function, different domain.
 
Not sure if this counts as a basic integration formula, but you can use the substitution u=sin(x) to get the correct answer.
 
If that is the case, then I was wondering if you could help me with this integration problem?

1. Homework Statement .

dx/sqrt(-x^2 - 4x)

Homework Equations


arcsinx

The Attempt at a Solution



I completed the square on the bottom resulting with

dx/sqrt(-(x+2)^2 - 4)

I originally took out the negative (thus having sqrt(a^2 - u^2)). My answer came out to be the same as the back of the book

arcsin[(x+2)/2] + C

However, if this is the same as the problem above, I can't take out the negative. Then, I'm stuck after completing the square.
 
lude1 said:
If that is the case, then I was wondering if you could help me with this integration problem?

1. Homework Statement .

dx/sqrt(-x^2 - 4x)

Homework Equations


arcsinx

The Attempt at a Solution



I completed the square on the bottom resulting with

dx/sqrt(-(x+2)^2 - 4)

I originally took out the negative (thus having sqrt(a^2 - u^2)). My answer came out to be the same as the back of the book

arcsin[(x+2)/2] + C

However, if this is the same as the problem above, I can't take out the negative. Then, I'm stuck after completing the square.

-x2-4x = -(x2+4x + 4)+4 = -(x+2)2+4

so this gives you a 1 - u2 form under the radical, which should give you an arcsine. You did two things wrong and got lucky.
 
Could you show us exactly how you are managing to move the -1 out of a root?
 
Ooh I see.. wow. Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K