Evaluating the Integral ∫∫R y√(x^2 + y^2) dA in Region R

  • Thread starter Thread starter helpm3pl3ase
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the integral ∫∫R y√(x^2 + y^2) dA over the region R defined by the inequalities 1 ≤ x^2 + y^2 ≤ 2 and 0 ≤ y ≤ x. The discussion focuses on the setup and evaluation of this double integral, particularly considering the use of polar coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the original setup of the integral and question the appropriateness of the chosen limits and coordinate system. There are suggestions to switch to polar coordinates, with some participants attempting to express the integral in that form.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the region of integration and the corresponding limits. Some participants express confusion about the graphical representation of the region, while others emphasize the benefits of sketching the area to clarify the integration limits. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of polar coordinates and the necessity of understanding the geometric interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the region defined by the inequalities and the potential challenges of integrating in Cartesian coordinates. There is a recognition that the region is bounded by circles and lines, which affects the limits of integration.

helpm3pl3ase
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Evaluate the integral

∫∫R y√(x^2 + y^2) dA

with R the region {(x, y) : 1 ≤ x^2 + y^2 ≤ 2, 0 ≤ y ≤ x.}

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Solution:

∫(2 to 1)∫(x to 0) y√(x^2 + y^2) dy dx

∫(2 to 1) 1/3[(x^2 + y^2)^(3/2)] |(y=x and y=0) dx

1/3 ∫(2 to 1) [(x^2 + y^2)^(3/2) - (x^2)^(3/2)] dx

1/3 x 2/5 [(x^2 + y^2)^(5/2) - (x^2)^(5/2)] |(x=2 to x=1)

final answer: 4(124√2 - 33)/15

Is this the correct answer??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, I don't think that's right. For one thing the number is far too large to fit in the annulus 1<=r<=2. And for another, why don't you use the polar coordinates the problem is so obviously screaming for?
 
so

∫(2 to 1)∫(x to 0) y√(x^2 + y^2) dy dx
∫(2 to 1)∫(x to 0) ((r sin(theta)(r^2)^1/2)r dr dtheta
∫(2 to 1)∫(x to 0) ((r^2 sin(theta)(r^3)^1/2) dr dtheta

Like this?
 
Sort of like that, but without the errors. Where did (r^3)^(1/2) come from? And you are integrating dtheta. What are the theta limits?
 
I got the (r^3)^(1/2) from multiplying the r on the outside to the inside.. the (1/2) is the sqrt and the r^3 is from multiplying it with the r..

also the theta limit would be r to 0, rather than x to 0??
 
helpm3pl3ase said:
I got the (r^3)^(1/2) from multiplying the r on the outside to the inside.. the (1/2) is the sqrt and the r^3 is from multiplying it with the r..

also the theta limit would be r to 0, rather than x to 0??

The r power is wrong. You started with (r^2)^(1/2). Not (r)^(1/2). Why do you think the theta limits are 0 to r? Is that just a random guess? Did you draw a picture of the region?
 
oh its a circle that would go from 2pie to 0.. but iam still confused about the other part
 
helpm3pl3ase said:
oh its a circle that would go from 2pie to 0.. but iam still confused about the other part

? What do you think it looks like? 0<=y<=x. Start picking some values of x and sketching the region.
 
What if i tried not to use polar and did this..

from above we have:

∫(2 to 1)∫(x to 0) y√(x^2 + y^2) dy dx

∫(2 to 1) 1/3[(x^2 + y^2)^(3/2)] |(y=x and y=0) dx

1/3 ∫(2 to 1) x^3 dx

1/3 x 1/4 x^4 | (x = 2 and x =1)

final answer: 5/4
 
  • #10
Just because you aren't using polar coordinates doesn't mean you can skip understanding the problem. Sketch the region! If you do this you will realize you can't do it dx*dy using a single set of limits. You'd have to split the region up. Polar is easier.
 
  • #11
iam not so sure i know how to sketch it.
 
  • #12
It's kind of tedious if you don't use polar coordinates. If you do by polar, you won't have to worry about finding the limits of y as a function of x. The limits in polar coordinates are just numbers.
 
  • #13
helpm3pl3ase said:
iam not so sure i know how to sketch it.

Start with 1<=r<=2. Any ideas what that might look like? Then try 0<=y<=x. As I said, pick a value of x, say x=1. What values of y work? Draw them. Try x=2. Draw them. Etc. Until you get the general picture.
 
  • #14
helpm3pl3ase said:
iam not so sure i know how to sketch it.
Well, you have x^2 + y^2 ≤ 2. Consider the case x^2 + y^2 = 2. This represents a circle of radius sqrt(2). Consider also x^2 + y^2 = 1. This is circle of radius 1. The region you want is in between these 2 in the inequality. How does this translate graphically? For y<=x, draw the line y=x and determine the locus of points where y<x. The intersection of these 2 regions is the region over which the double integration is performed.
 
  • #15
hm what I came up with, which is probably wrong, is almost like a triangle in the first quad...

so therefore you would go from (pie/2)/2 = pie/4 to 0??
 
  • #16
Yes, in the first quadrant it is a triangular region extending to infinity. I'm assuming you haven't found the other region corresponding to 1 ≤ x^2 + y^2 ≤ 2. But what about the other quadrants?
 
  • #17
helpm3pl3ase said:
hm what I came up with, which is probably wrong, is almost like a triangle in the first quad...

so therefore you would go from (pie/2)/2 = pie/4 to 0??

Yessss! The region is 1<=r<=2 and 0<=theta<=pi/4. It is a wedge shaped triangular region intersected with a ring shaped region.
 
  • #18
helpm3pl3ase said:
hm what I came up with, which is probably wrong, is almost like a triangle in the first quad...

so therefore you would go from (pie/2)/2 = pie/4 to 0??

Yessss! The region is 1<=r<=2 and 0<=theta<=pi/4. It is a wedge shaped triangular region. See how helpful sketching the region is?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K