(Event generation) What information do you get....

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generation Information
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the normalization of event generation in particle physics, specifically regarding the W/Z boson production using POWHEG. It clarifies that while the total number of events is normalized to the Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order (NNLO) inclusive cross section, the actual production occurs at a lower order, either Leading Order (LO) or Next-to-Leading Order (NLO). The scaling of events is expressed mathematically as \(\frac{\sigma_{LO/NLO}}{\sigma_{NNLO}}\), indicating that the distributions reflect lower-order calculations despite the normalization being accurate to NNLO.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics concepts, particularly event generation.
  • Familiarity with POWHEG (Positive Weight Hardest Emission Generator) framework.
  • Knowledge of cross section calculations, specifically NNLO, NLO, and LO.
  • Basic grasp of observable distributions in high-energy physics experiments.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical formulation of cross sections in particle physics.
  • Explore the POWHEG framework documentation for advanced event generation techniques.
  • Learn about the implications of using NLO+PS (Next-to-Leading Order plus Parton Shower) in simulations.
  • Investigate the differences between fixed-order calculations and parton shower simulations.
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in high-energy physics, and anyone involved in event generation and simulation using POWHEG or similar frameworks.

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
What information do you get by reading that some sample production (like the W/Z for Powheg) is normalized to the NNLO cross sections?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChrisVer said:
What information do you get by reading that some sample production (like the W/Z for Powheg) is normalized to the NNLO cross sections?

The Meaning on that statement is that the total number of events is normalized to the calculated NNLO inclusive cross section.

The production itself is done at a lower order (LO or NLO), so the shapes of all the distrubutions reflect these lower orders.

But the total normalization is accurate to NNLO.
 
So the events get scaled by something like this:
\frac{\sigma_{LO/NLO}}{\sigma_{NNLO}}?
 
ChrisVer said:
So the events get scaled by something like this:
\frac{\sigma_{LO/NLO}}{\sigma_{NNLO}}?

The total number of events are normalised by \frac{\sigma_{NNLO}}{\sigma_{LO/NLO}}
 
So practically:

\sigma_{nnlo}/\sigma_{nlo} d \sigma_{nlo} /dX

Where X is the observable. Practically though, POWHEG samples are not actually NLO accurate for distributions, since it's NLO+PS (not fixed order).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K