Evidence that the Universe is Expanding?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The universe is definitively expanding, supported by multiple lines of evidence including the redshift of distant galaxies and the uniform movement of celestial bodies away from us, which aligns with the cosmological principle. This principle asserts that no location in the universe is privileged, and the observed redshift is proportional to the distance of galaxies, indicating an expanding universe rather than mere drifting in empty space. Additionally, supernovae Ia luminosity serves as an independent confirmation of this expansion. The misconception that expansion necessitates a finite universe is clarified through mathematical analogies involving infinite spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the cosmological principle
  • Familiarity with redshift and its implications in astrophysics
  • Basic knowledge of thermodynamics, particularly the second law
  • Concepts of limits and infinity in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of redshift in cosmology
  • Study the properties and significance of supernovae Ia in measuring cosmic distances
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of the cosmological principle
  • Investigate the role of dark energy in the expansion of the universe
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, astrophysicists, and students of physics seeking to understand the evidence and implications of the universe's expansion.

zketrouble
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

First let me say that I'm not an astrophysicist but that I have some understanding of classical physics. So it has been said that the universe is expanding, but what evidence is there of this other than the fact that things seem to be drifting apart? Since much of the universe is unobservable to us due to the rate which light from foreign objects travel to us, how can it be so asserted that the universe is expanding and that it is finite rather than infinite? If something is getting bigger it must be finite. Couldn't things just be drifting away from each other in empty space? Sure gravity would probably cause the opposite, but only if two bodies were large/close enough. Seems like just as good of an explanation as saying that empty space, nothingness, is being created from nothing.

Of course the second law of thermodynamics states that entropy of the universe is always increasing. In this case, what would happen in so many billion years when the universe reaches maximum entropy? Well if the universe and matter were infinite, maximum entropy would never be achieved. In a finite universe, more space would increase the number of states in which matter could exist.

How theoretical is the statement that the universe is getting expanding? Just curious.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
zketrouble said:
So it has been said that the universe is expanding, but what evidence is there of this other than the fact that things seem to be drifting apart?
Well, there's a lot of evidence for this. For one, everything is moving uniformly in one direction: away from us! Now, under your point of view, you could simply assert that we are, in some sense, a privileged point in the universe and everything is moving away from us because we smell bad. But we have something called the cosmological principle that is an extension of the Copernican principle. Basically it says that we are in no special place in the universe.

Furthermore, it's not just that everything is moving away, but everything is moving away with speed linearly proportional to its distance. This is very difficult to explain if everything is simply "moving away", but yet falls right out of the mathematics of an expanding universe.

Since much of the universe is unobservable to us due to the rate which light from foreign objects travel to us, how can it be so asserted that the universe is expanding and that it is finite rather than infinite?
Saying the universe is expanding is not linked to the question of whether or not the universe is finite.

If something is getting bigger it must be finite.
This is a very common misconception. When we think of a balloon expanding, or some other such analogy, we see the balloon as a finite object expanding into 3-dimensional space. Unfortunately for our human minds, this need not be the only case. Imagine the cartesian plane, (x,y). Now, this is clearly an infinite plane as you can choose arbitrarily large values for x,y, or both. Now imagine that there are little dots on the plane at every integer intersection, i.e (1,1), (2,2), (-3,2), (-1,-1), etc, so that they form a grid. Now double the distance between any two adjacent dots. Someone sitting on one of the dots would certainly claim that his universe has expanded! His nearest neighbors are now 2 units away, and those which used to be 2 units away are now 4 units away! But yet, we started with an infinite object and we end with an infinite object.

It comes down to a misunderstanding of limits and infinity. A good calculus course should usually clear this up.

How theoretical is the statement that the universe is getting expanding? Just curious.

No more theoretical than Newton's law of gravity. It is very, very well established.
 
Thanks!
 
Am I wrong, or is the only evidence of an expanding universe the red shift---?
r rosenthal
 
rrosenthal said:
Am I wrong, or is the only evidence of an expanding universe the red shift---?
r rosenthal

Dark Energy though not an evidence,yet.
 
One independent confirmation of redshift distance is supernovae Ia luminosity. This was also used to detect expansion of the universe.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
643
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K