Can the Exact Boltzmann Distribution Yield Specific Quantum State Populations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the exact Boltzmann distribution to yield specific quantum state populations, particularly focusing on the formula ni = InverseDigamma(-α-β*εi)-1. Participants debate the feasibility of obtaining integer occupancy numbers (n0, n1, n2, n3, n4, n5, n6, n7) given parameters N=11, E=7, and Δε=1. The consensus indicates that an additional constraint requiring integer values for ni is necessary for physical relevance, as non-integer occupancy numbers do not represent actual configurations. The conversation also explores the potential redefinition of the Gamma function to achieve integer solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Boltzmann distribution and its applications in statistical mechanics.
  • Familiarity with the Digamma function and its relationship to the Gamma function.
  • Knowledge of quantum state populations and occupancy numbers in statistical physics.
  • Basic grasp of probability theory as it relates to dynamic systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of the Gamma function in statistical mechanics.
  • Study the implications of integer occupancy numbers in quantum state distributions.
  • Explore the relationship between the Boltzmann distribution and heat capacity calculations.
  • Investigate the recursion relations associated with the Digamma function for practical applications.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and researchers in statistical mechanics who are analyzing quantum state populations and the implications of occupancy numbers in dynamic systems.

rabbed
Messages
241
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Exact Boltzmann distribution
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the issue is that there should really be another constraint - that the ni’s should be integers. Otherwise the answers won’t make much physical sense (non-integer occupancy numbers). We’re relying on the Digamma function coming from a Gamma function which can be defined in multiple ways as long as its integer inputs give integer outputs..
Maybe the Gamma function can be redefined so that we get integer solutions for the occupancy numbers?
 
There is no reason for the ni*s to be integral. n is treated as a continuous variable to permit differentiation. (See section D.) The ni*s are the values that maximise the probability function. Of course non-integral nis don't describe an actual physical configuration. If they have a physical meaning, I suggest it is as a time-average, as molecules are constantly being bumped up and down between levels. I'm not sure there's a simple way to determine the physical configuration (integral nis) with the highest probability, other than trial and error. Do you need to do this?
 
Thank you for answering!
Seen as a strictly mathematical problem (N distinct balls in K distinct boxes labeled with increasing integer scores) there is an actual right answer/distribution with a probability, so why wouldn’t we want that instead of relying on some random answer that depend on how the gamma function was derived when there in fact are several correct ”Gamma”-functions which extends the factorial? See: http://www.luschny.de/math/factorial/hadamard/HadamardsGammaFunction.html
 
I suppose the issue is, at least partly, that in a dynamic system the configuration is constantly changing. Each configuration has a probability, and one of them is the most probable, but none is "the configuration" of the system. (Unlike the Boltzmann distribution for large N, where fluctuations in ni are very small compared to ni.) But you can define a time-average, with non-integral average occupancy numbers, which is useful for calculating things like heat capacity, as in the paper. (I guess for the physicist it isn't "seen as a strictly mathematical problem".)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
17K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K