Hello all,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am developing a model of multiple gaps in a square lattice. I simplified the associated Hamiltonian to make it quadratic. In this approximation it is given by,

[tex]

H =

\begin{pmatrix}

\xi_\mathbf{k} & -\sigma U_1 & -U_2 & -U_2\\

-\sigma U_1 & \xi_{\mathbf{k}+(\pi,\pi)} & 0 & 0\\

- U_2 & 0 & \xi_{\mathbf{k}+(\pi/2,0)} & 0\\

- U_2 & 0 & 0 & \xi_{\mathbf{k}+(0,\pi/2)}

\end{pmatrix}

[/tex]

And my Nambu operator is given by,

[tex]

ψ_\mathbf{k} =

\begin{pmatrix}

c_{\mathbf{k},\sigma} \\

c_{\mathbf{k}+(\pi,\pi),\sigma} \\

c_{\mathbf{k}+(\pi/2,0),\sigma} \\

c_{\mathbf{k}+(0,\pi/2),\sigma}

\end{pmatrix}

[/tex]

I tried to diagonalized by making three Bogoliubov transformations, the first to diagonalize the upper right submatrix of H, and then the two others (a sort of nested transformations). But I get a lengthy result, what I would like to know if there is a smart transformation which allows me to write

[tex] H = A_1^\dagger A_2^\dagger A_3^\dagger D A_3 A_2 A_1 [/tex]

or simply

[tex] H = U^\dagger D U [/tex]

Or the only way is to use just brute force?

Thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Exact diagonalization by Bogoliubov transformation

Loading...

Similar Threads - Exact diagonalization Bogoliubov | Date |
---|---|

I Numerical Diagonalization | Mar 9, 2017 |

Diagonalization of a hamiltonian for a quantum wire | Aug 7, 2013 |

What exactly is a hole?` | Mar 4, 2010 |

What exactly is a smearing | Nov 10, 2008 |

Exact definitions of BEC for real gases-liquids? | Aug 30, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**