Exact meaning of a local base at zero in a topological vector space

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a local base at zero (l.b.z.) in the context of topological vector spaces (t.v.s.). Participants explore the implications of the definition provided by Rudin and its relationship to open sets in the topology, particularly regarding the formation of open sets through translations of sets in a local base.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the definition of a local base at zero and its implications for the topology, referencing Rudin's definition.
  • Another participant asserts that any open set in the topology can be expressed as unions of translations of sets from a local base at zero, providing a reasoning process to support this claim.
  • A subsequent reply agrees with the equivalence of the two concepts and expresses intent to work on a proof, seeking additional resources for clarification.
  • Another participant notes the familiarity with neighborhood bases in topological spaces and emphasizes the translation-invariance of the topology in t.v.s., suggesting that this property allows for consideration of the neighborhood base at any point, particularly zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There appears to be a consensus among some participants regarding the equivalence of the local base at zero and the formation of open sets through translations. However, the initial confusion expressed indicates that not all participants may fully agree or understand the implications, leaving some aspects of the discussion unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference definitions and properties that may depend on specific interpretations of topological concepts, and there are indications of missing assumptions or unresolved steps in the reasoning process.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and researchers in functional analysis, topology, and related fields who are exploring the properties of topological vector spaces and the concept of local bases.

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
I am confused as to exactly what a local base at zero (l.b.z.) tells us about a topology. The definition given in Rudin is the following: "An l.b.z. is a collection G of open sets containing zero such that if O is any open set containing zero, there is an element of G contained in O". Ok, great.

But I have seen some proofs in my functional analysis class that suggest something like the following: Any open set in the topology can be formed by taking unions (possibly uncountable) of *translations* of sets in a l.b.z. Is this true, or am I just missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the two are equivalent!

Basically, take an open set G in the topology. If a is in G, then G-a contains 0, thus we can find an element V_A of the lbz, such that [tex]V\subseteq G-a[/tex]. Thus [tex]a+V[/tex] contains a and is smaller than G. Now, we can write G as

[tex]G=\bigcup_{a\in G}{a+V_a}[/tex]

Thus we have written G as union of translations of the lbz...
 
micromass said:
Yes, the two are equivalent!
Great, thanks! Now that I know that, I'm going to try to work out a proof. But is this discussed in Rudin, or on the web, somewhere in case I get stuck?
 
Sorry I posted too fast. I was going to include a proof. I've edited my post 1 with the proof...
 
You are already familiar with a neighbourhood base in any topogical space.

Now, the topology on a t.v.s. (or a topological group for that matter) is translation-invariant. This is because "translation by a fixed g"
[itex]T_g:x\mapsto x+g[/itex]
is a homeomorphism (which is because addition is by definition continuous, and T_g is obviously invertible). So it suffices to consider the neighborhood base of any point, in particular 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K