Examining the Accuracy of a Movie Scene

  • Thread starter Thread starter wittgenstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accuracy Movie
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the accuracy of a movie scene that presents concepts related to quantum mechanics, particularly the double slit experiment. Participants evaluate the scene's merits while addressing its presentation and terminology.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the scene accurately conveys the quantum mechanical explanation of the double slit experiment, with minor potential for nitpicking on terminology and graphics.
  • Others express that while the scene is not wrong, the terminology used may not adequately capture the complex concepts being described.
  • A participant draws an analogy comparing the explanation of quantum concepts to Ghengis Khan attempting to explain electricity, highlighting the challenges of language and understanding across different contexts.
  • One participant finds the segment to be very understandable and accessible to a general audience, suggesting that it effectively presents the concepts.
  • There are discussions about the practicality of saving video clips and the technical aspects of doing so, with some participants sharing their preferences for web browsers and add-ons.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express mixed views on the accuracy and clarity of the movie scene, with no clear consensus on whether the terminology used is sufficient or appropriate for the concepts being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the adequacy of language to describe complex scientific concepts, as well as the implications of non-locality in quantum mechanics.

wittgenstein
Messages
222
Reaction score
7


This is from a stupid movie, lots of new age nonsense etc. However, please disregard that and judge this segment on its own merits. Is it accurate? I am not being sarcastic or have a hidden agenda. I just want to know!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it is a correct exposition of the quantum mechanical explanation of the double slit experiment. It is probably possible to do some nitpicking on some of the terminology and graphics, but essentially it is correct.
 
It's pretty good.
IMO Any nitpicking would be completely unjustified.
 
It's not wrong.
But we don't really have the words to adequately discuss the concepts he's describing.

It's as if Ghengis Khan were explaining to his hordes about electricity. What words could he use that would make sense to him and his audience? Even if he somehow vaguely understood it himself, would he have the words available in his language to form even a crude explanation?
 
wittgenstein said:


This is from a stupid movie, lots of new age nonsense etc. However, please disregard that and judge this segment on its own merits. Is it accurate? I am not being sarcastic or have a hidden agenda. I just want to know!


The segment is great - very understandable. It presents the concept in a way that can be readily understood by most. There are also many other similar clips on that site.

Thanks for posting it.

These clips would be very handy to have. How does one save a UTube clip ? Is it possible ? Anybody know ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
alt said:
These clips would be very handy to have. How does one save a UTube clip ? Is it possible ? Anybody know ?
Presuming you're already using firefox, just browse the popular add-ons. (Of course it's possible: they can't show you the video without transmitting a copy of the data to the machine which, as it still happens, you control.)

You're worried whether you could ever find particular videos again (say, if google were to receive a take down request)?
 
cesiumfrog said:
Presuming you're already using firefox, just browse the popular add-ons. (Of course it's possible: they can't show you the video without transmitting a copy of the data to the machine which, as it still happens, you control.)

You're worried whether you could ever find particular videos again (say, if google were to receive a take down request)?

I don't want to sidetrack this thread, but;

No, I'm using the latest Internet Explorer. I'm actually starting to hate it, and should probably find an alternative. I tried FF a couple of years ago, but it left me not impressed. Is it better these days ?

I want to save the clips not because they might be taken down, but because I would like to view them / show them off line.
 
AJ Bentley said:
It's as if Ghengis Khan were explaining to his hordes about electricity. What words could he use that would make sense to him and his audience? Even if he somehow vaguely understood it himself, would he have the words available in his language to form even a crude explanation?
Something about devising precise and intricate runes out of bronze and blood, through which tiny bits of lightning circulate, casting magical light or crudely animating inanimate carts or golems..?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
11K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
32K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K