Example on Z-modules .... Dummit & Foote, Page 339 ....

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the example of Z-modules from Dummit and Foote's "Abstract Algebra" (Third Edition), specifically in Chapter 10, Section 10.1. The participant seeks clarification on how the module axioms confirm that the defined action of the integers on a set A is the only valid action that can make A a unital Z-module. The response explains that any action satisfying the module axioms must conform to the established definition, demonstrating that the action is uniquely determined by these axioms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of module theory and its axioms
  • Familiarity with Z-modules and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of group theory, particularly Abelian groups
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation and operations involving integers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the module axioms in detail to understand their implications
  • Explore examples of Z-modules beyond those in Dummit and Foote
  • Learn about the relationship between Abelian groups and Z-modules
  • Investigate other types of modules, such as vector spaces and their properties
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers interested in abstract algebra, particularly those focusing on module theory and its applications in algebraic structures.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote's book: "Abstract Algebra" (Third Edition) ...

I am currently studying Chapter 10: Introduction to Module Theory ... ...

I need some help with an aspect of Dummit and Foote's example on Z-modules in Section 10.1 Basic Definitions and Examples ... ...Dummit and Foote's example on Z-modules reads as follows:
D&F - Z-modules Example - page 339 ... .png


In the above example we read the following:

" ... ... This definition of an action on the integers on ##A## makes ##A## into a ##\mathbb{Z}##-module, and the module axioms show that this is the only possible action of ##\mathbb{Z}## on ##A## making it a (unital) ##\mathbb{Z}##-module ... ... "Can someone please explain how/why the module axioms demonstrate that this is the only possible action of ##\mathbb{Z}## on ##A## making it a (unital) ##\mathbb{Z}##-module ... ... ? How do we know it is the only possible such action ... ... ?Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • D&F - Z-modules Example - page 339 ... .png
    D&F - Z-modules Example - page 339 ... .png
    51.2 KB · Views: 566
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey peter.

Take any action ##\mathbb{Z} \times A \to A: (n,a) \mapsto n.a## satisfying the module axioms.

It is easy to see that

##n.a = (1+1+ \dots +1).a = 1.a + \dots + 1.a = a + \dots + a## if n > 0.

The other cases can be treated in the same way. Since I assumed nothing but the action axioms, it follows that if there is an action, it must look like the action that is written is your book.

Hope this helps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
We have ##1.a=a## and ##0.a=0##. Then ##n.a=((n-1)+1).a=(n-1).a+1.a=(a+\ldots+a)_{n-1\text{ times }} \cdot a + a=n\cdot a## by induction. The same works for ##-a## if we use ##0=0.a## to show ##(-1).a=-a\,.##

Remark: Here ##n.a## stands for an operation of ##\mathbb{Z}## on ##A## and ##n\cdot a## for ##n## additions, resp. subtractions of ##a##, because at prior, ##n\cdot a## isn't defined, so it is merely a short hand notation of ## a+\ldots +a## (##n## times), which is defined. The assertion is basically that the two don't have to be distinguished, and we can speak of the operation, which makes Abelian groups (additively written) naturally into a ##\mathbb{Z}-##module.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
662