Examples of Separation Axioms

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around providing examples of separation axioms in topology. For the first example, the proposed space X as R and subspace A as R-Q is deemed inadequate since the irrationals form a separable subspace of R. The second example involves a function from N to a modified set Y that includes sqrt(2), but there is uncertainty about the countability of bases for Y. The third example remains unresolved, with a suggestion to consider using the same set for both X and Y but applying different topologies. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in defining spaces and their properties in relation to separation axioms.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
My assignment is like this:
1.give an example of a space X and a subspace A of X s.t X satisifes Sep and A doesnt.
2.give an example of a continuous and onto function f:X->Y s.t X satisifies S1 but Y doesnt.
3.give an example of a continuous and onto function f:X->Y s.t X satisfies S2 and Y doesnt.

my answers are as follows:
1. X=R A=R-Q, is it a good example?
2.X=N, Y=N-{0}U{sqrt2} and f:X->Y f(x)=x if x in N-{0} and f(x)=sqrt2 if x=0, i think we can't find a countable set of bases for Y, not sure though.
3. didn't do it so far, any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, what do you mean by "separation"? I would consider all of the "Tychonoff" properties to be "separation" properties: T0: each singleton set is closed; T1: given any two points, there exist a set that contains one of them but not the other; T2 (Hausdorf): Given any two points there exist two disjoint open set such that one contains one point and the other set contains the other point.
 
Sep says there's a countable dense set.
S1 says there's a countable basis at a point.
S2 says there's a countable basis for the topology.

those should be the countability axioms, sorry for misleading.
 
"1." isn't good. The irrationals are actually a separable subspace of R (in the usual topology). In fact, if X is a separable metric space, then any subspace of X is separable as well. So your example is going to have to come from a non-metrizable topology.

For 2, what topology are you giving Y?

For 3, I would think about using X=Y, but giving it two topologies, one finer than the other. Then maybe using f=identity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
866
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K