Excitation of wispering gallery mode in resonator

  • Thread starter Thread starter yefj
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on improving the coupling of a resonator designed to produce whispering gallery modes at frequencies of 9.87 GHz and 11.29 GHz. Participants suggest that better coupling may reduce the quality factor (Q) of the cavity, and they discuss the implications of using loop versus probe coupling methods. One recommendation is to connect the probe directly to the cavity wall to form a coupling loop antenna, which could enhance magnetic field coupling. The conversation also highlights the importance of matching the source and load to minimize insertion loss, emphasizing the complexity of achieving optimal coupling. Overall, achieving better coupling while managing Q remains a key challenge in resonator design.
yefj
Messages
58
Reaction score
2
Hello,I have built a resonator which needs to produce whispering gallery mode and coupled threw coaxial cables .
I got a mode at 9.87z and at 11.29Ghz.
But its coupling is very low .
How can I increase the coupling to this mode?
Thanks.
2025-05-21 12-38-37.mkv
1747821433599.webp

1747821400896.webp

1747821355069.webp

1747822129345.webp

1747822176811.webp
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
yefj said:
But its coupling is very low .
How can I increase the coupling to this mode?
I assume you are referring to coupling of the input cable, and output cable, to the cavity. Better coupling may reduce the Q of the cavity.

You show the shield entering into the cavity with only a small probe exposed. How did you select those dimensions?

I would consider removing the shield and connecting the tip of the probe to the wall. That would form a small coupling loop antenna.
 
Hello,Could you please draw what you mean in general?
How down it helpes with achieving good coupling?
 
yefj said:
Hello,Could you please draw what you mean in general?
Cavity-excitation-using-a-loop-coupling-b-electric-probe-coupling-and-c-aperture.webp

(a) If you use a loop, you are coupling with the magnetic field.
(b) If you use a probe, you are coupling with an electric field.
yefj said:
How down it helpes with achieving good coupling?
Higher currents can be induced in the cavity walls. Depending on the orientation of the loop, you can excite different modes of resonance.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Baluncore said:
Better coupling may reduce the Q of the cavity.
Ain't that always the way? Good coupling implies a matched load which will produce a low Q. A high Q system must only pass a small amount of power. It's horses for courses I would say.
yefj said:
How can I increase the coupling to this mode?
Do you mean to minimise insertion loss? That would imply matching the source and load. There are a lot of variables, I think.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top