Existence of divergent solutions to system of ODEs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the divergence of solutions in systems of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), specifically those modeled by the equation \(\frac{d X_i}{dt} = F_i(\mathbf{X)}\). The author seeks methods to determine when solutions diverge, meaning they tend to infinity as time approaches infinity. Key insights include the importance of the basin of attraction in non-linear dynamics and the recommendation to analyze the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix to assess solution stability. Additionally, switching from explicit to implicit numerical integration methods may improve stability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with non-linear dynamics and attractors
  • Knowledge of numerical integration techniques
  • Basic concepts of Jacobian matrices and eigenvalues
NEXT STEPS
  • Research stability analysis of ODEs using Jacobian matrices
  • Learn about implicit vs. explicit numerical integration methods
  • Explore literature on non-linear dynamics and attractor basins
  • Investigate Borel summability and multisummability in the context of divergent series
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and practitioners in applied mathematics, particularly those working with ecological modeling, numerical analysis, and stability of dynamical systems.

vega12
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
My question is in regards to systems of ordinary differential equations. One of my research topics right now involves working with some complicated coupled ODEs used to model ecological stuff. Without getting into the details, the model I am working on now has a bad tendency to diverge for some initial conditions. I have thought and searched for a while now, but have been unable to come up with some good ways of determining when a system of ODEs will have certain solutions that diverge. Does anyone know of some literature or techniques that might be useful for me? I would very much appreciate any help you could provide. Thank you very much.

EDIT:

To avoid further misunderstanding, the type of equations I am considering are of the form:

\frac{d X_i}{dt} = F_i(\mathbf{X)}

When I say that a solution diverges, I mean that given a set of initial conditions, the solution will diverge in time. As for what I mean by diverge, I mean that solutions tend to infinity as t approaches infinity. So solutions that settle in on a point, or go through some oscillatory behavior, even chaotic oscillatory behavior, would be considered non-divergent.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Strictly speaking, a divergent series does not define a function. So I am not at all sure what you mean by a divergent series being a solution. It sounds to me like you are asking for conditions in which the "series method" of solution is unstable.
 
Divergent series are solutions as formal series, and sometimes they define functions, but in sectors, of course not in discs. See Borel summability and multisummablity.
 
My apologizes for not making my question as clear as it should have been. All the systems of equations I am working with are of the form:

\frac{d X_i}{dt} = F_i(\mathbf{X)}

So when I say that a solution diverges, I mean that given a set of initial conditions, the solution will diverge in time. As for what I mean by diverge, I mean that solutions tend to infinity as t approaches infinity. So solutions that settle in on a point, or go through some oscillatory behavior, even chaotic oscillatory behavior, would be considered non-divergent.

I hope this clarifies what I mean. I'll append this to the opening post.
 
vega12 said:
My apologizes for not making my question as clear as it should have been. All the systems of equations I am working with are of the form:

\frac{d X_i}{dt} = F_i(\mathbf{X)}

So when I say that a solution diverges, I mean that given a set of initial conditions, the solution will diverge in time. As for what I mean by diverge, I mean that solutions tend to infinity as t approaches infinity. So solutions that settle in on a point, or go through some oscillatory behavior, even chaotic oscillatory behavior, would be considered non-divergent.

I hope this clarifies what I mean. I'll append this to the opening post.

Well that just sounds like non-linear dynamics in general and the solution diverges as you described when it finds itself outside an attractor's basin of attraction.
 
vega12 said:
My apologizes for not making my question as clear as it should have been. All the systems of equations I am working with are of the form:

\frac{d X_i}{dt} = F_i(\mathbf{X)}

So when I say that a solution diverges, I mean that given a set of initial conditions, the solution will diverge in time. As for what I mean by diverge, I mean that solutions tend to infinity as t approaches infinity. So solutions that settle in on a point, or go through some oscillatory behavior, even chaotic oscillatory behavior, would be considered non-divergent.

I hope this clarifies what I mean. I'll append this to the opening post.

Are you solving the equations numerically, using some kind of numerical integration package? If so, and you are using an explicit integrator, you may want to switch to an implicit integrator.

You can get an idea of the stability of the solution by looking at the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix, evaluated at the initial conditions. If any of the eigenvalues have a positive real part, the solution will be unstable, irrespective of the numerical integration method.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
17K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K