- #1
M. next
- 382
- 0
if ψ(o)=(1 0)[itex]^{T}[/itex] at time t=0.
According to some Hamiltonian, it was found that the corresponding eigenstates are |ø[itex]_{1}[/itex]> = 1/√2(1 i)[itex]^{T}[/itex] and |ø[itex]_{2}[/itex]> = 1/√2(1 -i)[itex]^{T}
so then we wanted to expand ψ(0) in terms of |ø[itex]_{1}[/itex]> and |ø[itex]_{2}[/itex]>:
the author got: 1/√2|ø[itex]_{1}[/itex]> + 1/√2 |ø[itex]_{2}[/itex]>
My question is that where did he get the coefficients of |ø[itex]_{1}[/itex]> and |ø[itex]_{2}[/itex]>?? Is there a certain rule to this?
Note: this is an easy example, I can give a more detailed one if needed.
According to some Hamiltonian, it was found that the corresponding eigenstates are |ø[itex]_{1}[/itex]> = 1/√2(1 i)[itex]^{T}[/itex] and |ø[itex]_{2}[/itex]> = 1/√2(1 -i)[itex]^{T}
so then we wanted to expand ψ(0) in terms of |ø[itex]_{1}[/itex]> and |ø[itex]_{2}[/itex]>:
the author got: 1/√2|ø[itex]_{1}[/itex]> + 1/√2 |ø[itex]_{2}[/itex]>
My question is that where did he get the coefficients of |ø[itex]_{1}[/itex]> and |ø[itex]_{2}[/itex]>?? Is there a certain rule to this?
Note: this is an easy example, I can give a more detailed one if needed.