Expanding Universe: Mass or Space-Time?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Moore1879
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of the universe's expansion, specifically whether it is the mass within the universe becoming more spread out or if space-time itself is stretching. It is established that, according to the standard General Relativity (GR) model, as time progresses, the hyper-surface of events perceived by an observer expands, indicating that mass is indeed becoming more dispersed. The cosmological principle of homogeneity and isotropy provides the necessary frame of reference for understanding this expansion. Additionally, the conversation touches on concepts such as black holes, entropy, and the potential for a multiverse, suggesting a complex interplay of cosmic phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with the cosmological principle of homogeneity and isotropy
  • Knowledge of black hole thermodynamics and the Bekenstein-Hawking formula
  • Conceptual grasp of multiverse theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Bekenstein-Hawking formula on black hole entropy
  • Explore the concept of foliation in space-time and its applications in cosmology
  • Learn about the observational evidence supporting the accelerating expansion of the universe
  • Investigate theories surrounding the multiverse and their impact on cosmological models
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the fundamental nature of the universe and its expansion dynamics.

Moore1879
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Okay, I understand that the universe is expanding. I also understand that in 1998 Cosmologist discovered that the Universe is accelerating rather than decelerating. My question is: "By expanding, do they mean that the mass in the universe is becoming more spread out, or is space time actually stretching out?" The idea that space-time itself is stretching out doesn't seem right to me. I'm just wondering.

Thank You
 
Space news on Phys.org
Space. not space-time is expanding with time within space-time. You have to foliate (slice) space-time into hyper-surfaces of space each separated by a time duration.

You need a special frame of reference to make that foliation and such is provided by the cosmological principle of homogeneity and isotropy.

In one special frame of reference, the one co-moving with the cosmological representative fluid, a homogeneous universe will look isotropic.

In the standard GR model, as time progresses, that hyper-surface of events 'simultanteous' with the observer, expands.

This means as you say,
the mass in the universe is becoming more spread out.

I hope this helps,

Garth
 
I suppose that in a hole, with a event horizon beeing constant (for a very long while), there is/was a kind of singularity which is expanding as far as we can observe (in our observable universe).
Starting at some time the singularity changed from radiation behaved to baryon behaved. In the mean time our hole is changing from a white hole into a black hole. In this hole, specialness from high to low, Blackhole are forming en clustering, entropy is going from low to high. Entropy will reach a value dictated by the Bekenstein-Hawking formula Sbh=A/4 . (Planck units 10^123). (see Penrose book "The road to reality"). That will not be the end of the story because black holes will evaporate in the spacetime of a multiverse. I suppose that in a multiverse a kind of concentrated radiation singularities will form serving as new bigbangs. (In such formation process entropy goes down). This way of thinking makes it possible for me see reality as a autonomous process without creation, begin or end. Of course this is pure speculation, but creation for me is even more speculative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K