Expansion at first order in QCD counterterm

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the expansion at first order in the counterterms ##\delta_2## and ##\delta_3## within Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). It emphasizes the evaluation of second-order loop corrections to quark and gluon self-energies and the gluon 3-vertex, which are essential for calculating the counterterms ##Z_1##, ##Z_2##, and ##Z_3##. The minimal-subtraction scheme is applied to determine coefficients to ##1/\epsilon## order by order in perturbation theory, ultimately leading to the expansion of the counterterm contributing to ##Z_g## up to order ##\alpha_s##. The discussion concludes that the divergence in ##1/\epsilon## is irrelevant as the limit ##\epsilon \to 0## is taken at the end.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Familiarity with the Dyson series and perturbation theory
  • Knowledge of counterterms and renormalization techniques
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the minimal-subtraction scheme in detail
  • Learn about the Slavnov-Taylor identity and its applications
  • Research the derivation of loop corrections in QCD
  • Examine the role of subdivergences in higher loop orders
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Chromodynamics, as well as researchers working on perturbative calculations and renormalization processes.

Siupa
Messages
30
Reaction score
5


What is the meaning of the expansion at first order in ##\delta_2## and ##\delta_3## at the second step in the last line? These quantities are not "small" - on the contrary, the entire point is to then take the ##\epsilon \to 0## limit and the counterterms blow up
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't read light gray on a less light gray background. Can you use LaTex and maybe post your source?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and berkeman
The Dyson series is an expansion in the coupling constant ##g##. Obviously you are evaluating the quoted 2nd-order loop corrections to the quark and gluon self-energies as well as the gluon 3-vertex to get the counter terms to evaluate ##Z_1##, ##Z_2##, and ##Z_3##, from which ##Z_g## follows through a Slavnov-Taylor identity (which maybe is Eq. (75), which you didn't quote). Of course since you have the said ##Z##-factors only to order ##g^2## (or order ##\alpha_s=g^2/(4 \pi)##), you can determine only the counterterm contributing to ##Z_g## to this order, and thus you have to expand the expression for it also up to order ##\alpha_s##.

In the here obviously applied minimal-subtraction scheme you need to find the coefficients to ##1/\epsilon## order by order perturbation theory. This determines the counter terms order by order. At higher loop order you have to take care of the subdivergences by using the corresponding counter terms of subdiagrams.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Siupa and topsquark
Vanadium 50 said:
I can't read light gray on a less light gray background. Can you use LaTex and maybe post your source?
If you open the imgur link it should be in high res. Anyways the reference is chapter 3, end of subchapter 3.3 of this pdf
 
vanhees71 said:
The Dyson series is an expansion in the coupling constant ##g##. Obviously you are evaluating the quoted 2nd-order loop corrections to the quark and gluon self-energies as well as the gluon 3-vertex to get the counter terms to evaluate ##Z_1##, ##Z_2##, and ##Z_3##, from which ##Z_g## follows through a Slavnov-Taylor identity (which maybe is Eq. (75), which you didn't quote). Of course since you have the said ##Z##-factors only to order ##g^2## (or order ##\alpha_s=g^2/(4 \pi)##), you can determine only the counterterm contributing to ##Z_g## to this order, and thus you have to expand the expression for it also up to order ##\alpha_s##.

In the here obviously applied minimal-subtraction scheme you need to find the coefficients to ##1/\epsilon## order by order perturbation theory. This determines the counter terms order by order. At higher loop order you have to take care of the subdivergences by using the corresponding counter terms of subdiagrams.
Eq. (75) is just the definition of ##Z_1 = Z_g Z_2 Z_3^{\frac{1}{2}}##. Anyways thank you I understand now, the expansions of ##1/Z_2## , ##1/Z_3## are obviously at first order in ##\alpha_s##, which in turn means first order in the counterterms since they are proportional to ##\alpha_s## because they were computed at 1-loop. I guess the divergence in ##1/\epsilon## doesn't matter since we only take the limit ##\epsilon \to 0## in the end?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Right! That's the idea!
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K