Expectation value of a hermitian operator prepared in an eigenstate

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2
Hey guys,

So this question is sort of a fundamental one but I'm a bit confused for some reason. Basically, say I have a Hermitian operator [itex]\hat{A}[/itex]. If I have a system that is prepared in an eigenstate of [itex]\hat{A}[/itex], that basically means that [itex]\hat{A}\psi = \lambda \psi[/itex], where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is real, right? So can I say the following, because the system is prepared in an eigenstate of [itex]\hat{A}[/itex]
[itex]∫\psi^{*}\psi=1[/itex]?

The reason I'm asking is because [itex]\psi[/itex] is just a function of [itex]x[/itex] - in literature the normalization is always written in terms of the big psi ([itex]\Psi[/itex]), which is a function of [itex]x,t[/itex].

Also, while I am at it - by saying that it is prepared in an eigenstate of [itex]\hat{A}[/itex] does that also mean that the probability of measuring this state is equal to 1? so that the wavefunction is collapsed to this eigenstate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dixanadu said:
So this question is sort of a fundamental one but I'm a bit confused for some reason. Basically, say I have a Hermitian operator [itex]\hat{A}[/itex]. If I have a system that is prepared in an eigenstate of [itex]\hat{A}[/itex], that basically means that [itex]\hat{A}\psi = \lambda \psi[/itex], where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is real, right?
Yes. However, you should write something like ψλ to make clear that ψ is the eigenstate for the eigenvalue λ. Usually, there are many different eigenvalues and corresponding eigenstates.

Dixanadu said:
So can I say the following, because the system is prepared in an eigenstate of [itex]\hat{A}[/itex]
[itex]∫\psi^{*}\psi=1[/itex]?
No. Why do you think this normalization is related to the property of ψ being an eigenstate of A?

Dixanadu said:
The reason I'm asking is because [itex]\psi[/itex] is just a function of [itex]x[/itex] - in literature the normalization is always written in terms of the big psi ([itex]\Psi[/itex]), which is a function of [itex]x,t[/itex].
If your wavefunction is normalized at some time, it will remain so at subsequent times. This is guaranteed by the Schrödinger equation (we say the time evolution is"unitary").

Dixanadu said:
Also, while I am at it - by saying that it is prepared in an eigenstate of [itex]\hat{A}[/itex] does that also mean that the probability of measuring this state is equal to 1?
More precisely, the probability of getting the corresponding eigenvalue as measurement outcome is 1.
 
Last edited: