Expectation value of an anti-Hermitian operator

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that the expectation value of an anti-Hermitian operator is a pure imaginary number. It is established that for an anti-self-adjoint operator, the eigenvalue associated with any eigenstate is equal to the expectation value. The key mathematical relationship shows that the eigenvalue must satisfy the condition λ = -λ*, leading to the conclusion that its real part is zero. Additionally, it is noted that multiplying an anti-Hermitian operator by 'i' results in a Hermitian operator, reinforcing that the eigenvalues are purely imaginary. The conversation also touches on the correct usage of terms like "expectation" and "expected value" in this context.
meteorologist1
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Hi, could anyone tell me how one would show that the expectation value of a anti-Hermitian operator is a pure imaginary number? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I solved this problem once right on this site...(Dunno if in the QM forum,or college homework).Use the site's search engine,or google to find it...

Daniel.
 
Yes,post #2 of that thread.Consider an antiself-adjoint linear operator \hat{A} for which u wish to prove that it has a spectrum made up of 0 & purely imaginary #-s...

\hat{A}|\psi\rangle=\lambda|\psi\rangle

for an arbitrary eigenvector |\psi\rangle corresponding to an eigenvalue \lambda

Then,the expectation value for this eigenstate is the eigenvalue,because

\langle\hat{A}\rangle_{|\psi\rangle}=\langle\psi|\hat{A}|\psi\rangle=\lambda(1)

The matrix element involved in (1) has the property

\langle\psi|\hat{A}|\psi\rangle=\left(\langle\psi|\hat{A}^{\dagger}|\psi\rangle\right)^{*}=\left(-\lambda\right)^{*} (2)

Equating (1) & (2),you get that

\lambda=-\lambda^{*} (3)

which means \mbox{Re}(\lambda) =0,Q.e.d.

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
In another form:

A anti hermitian => i.A is hermitian
=> eigenvalues of A= (eigenvalues of i.A)/i= -i.(real number)= imaginary number.
QED.


Seratend.
 
Ok thanks Daniel and Seratend.
 
By the way, "expectation" is a noun. "Expected" is an adjective.
The "expected value" is the "expectation".
 
HallsofIvy said:
By the way, "expectation" is a noun. "Expected" is an adjective.
The "expected value" is the "expectation".

I believe that used in this context, "expectation" becomes genitive, i.e. "value of an expectation". Other examples: economics textbook, price theory, etc.

Also - "expectation value" seems to be normal usage:

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ExpectationValue.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
772
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K