Expectation value of angular momentum

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the expectation value of angular momentum for a particle in a central potential with a specific wave function. The initial conditions indicate that the wave function is an eigenfunction of both the angular momentum squared and the z-component, leading to quantum numbers l=1 and m=0. It is established that the expectation value of angular momentum remains constant over time due to the commutation of the Hamiltonian with the angular momentum operator. The participants explore the expectation values of the components L_x and L_y, ultimately finding that both are zero, leading to a total expectation value of angular momentum being zero. The conclusion emphasizes that the expectation value of a vector operator is itself a vector, which is a key takeaway from the discussion.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,931
Reaction score
281

Homework Statement


A particle is under a central potential. Initially its wave function is an eigenfunction ##\psi## such that ##\hat {\vec L ^2} \psi = 2 \hbar ^2## , ##\hat L_3 \psi =0##.
Calculate the expectation value of ##\hat {\vec L}## for all times.

Homework Equations


##\frac{d}{dt}<\hat {\vec L}>=\frac{i}{\hbar } [\hat H , \hat {\vec L}]##.
I get that the quantum numbers of the eigenfunction are ##l=1##, ##m=0##. Not sure if that helps.

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the relevant equation, I get that ##\frac{d}{dt}<\hat {\vec L}>=0## because H commutes with L because it's a central potential problem. This means that the expectation value of the operator L is constant in time.
So I can calculate it at t=0, and use the information that at ##t=0##, ##\Psi (x,t=0)## is an eigenfunction (of the Hamiltonian but also of L^2 and L_z apparently).
So here's my problem: ##<\hat {\vec L}>(0)=<\psi , \hat {\vec L} \psi>##. I don't know how to calculate this. I've checked in Nouredine Zetilli's book because its said to have many solved problems but I couldn't find a single problem where one have to calculate the expected value of a vector operator such as ##\hat {\vec L}##.
Using intuition I guess I should rewrite that expectation value in terms of the expectation values of L^2 and L_z (=L_3) but I don't know how I could do this.

Here's an attempt: ##\hat {\vec L^2}=L_x^2+L_y^2+L_z^2##.
##\Rightarrow (L_x^2+L_y^2) \psi =2\hbar ^2 \psi##. Stuck here.

Here's another attempt: I want the expectation value of ##<L_x \hat i + L_y \hat j + L_z \hat k>##. I know I can't write this as ##<L_x>+<L_y>+<L_z>##. So I'm stuck here.

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fluidistic said:
Here's another attempt: I want the expectation value of ##<L_x \hat i + L_y \hat j + L_z \hat k>##. I know I can't write this as ##<L_x>+<L_y>+<L_z>##.

Well, obviously not, since it's a vector :smile:

But you can write it as \langle L_x \rangle \hat i+ \langle L_y \rangle \hat j + \langle L_z \rangle \hat k.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oxvillian said:
Well, obviously not, since it's a vector :smile:

But you can write it as \langle L_x \rangle \hat i+ \langle L_y \rangle \hat j + \langle L_z \rangle \hat k.

I see thanks, with the last term being equal to 0.
So I am left with ##<\hat {\vec L}>=<L_x>\hat i + <L_y> \hat j##. I'm not sure on how to proceed.
 
Try expressing ##L_x## and ##L_y## in terms of ladder operators.
 
Oxvillian said:
Try expressing ##L_x## and ##L_y## in terms of ladder operators.
Oh right...
##L_x \psi =L_x |1,0>=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt 2} (|1,1>+|1,-1>)##. Similarly ##L_y=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt 2 i}(|1,1>+|1,-1>)##.
Then if the relation ##<L_x>=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt 2}(<|1,1>>+<|1,-1>>)## is true, then ##<L_x>=0## and ##<L_y>=0##.

This would make that ##<\hat { \vec L}>(t)=0 \hat i + 0 \hat j + 0 \hat k##.
So I am learning that the expectation value of a "vector operator" is actually a vector... I would have thought that the expectation value of anything would be a scalar!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K