Expectation value of angular momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the expectation value of angular momentum for a particle under a central potential, specifically when the wave function is an eigenfunction of the angular momentum operators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the eigenfunction's quantum numbers and the commutation relations between the Hamiltonian and angular momentum operators.
  • There are attempts to express the expectation value of the angular momentum vector in terms of its components and to relate these components to ladder operators.
  • Some participants question how to compute the expectation value of a vector operator and explore the relationship between the components of angular momentum.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various methods to express and calculate the expectation values of the angular momentum components. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of ladder operators, but no consensus has been reached on the final calculation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of calculating the expectation value of a vector operator and the implications of the central potential on the angular momentum operators. There is also mention of the original poster's uncertainty regarding the calculation of expectation values at time t=0.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,932
Reaction score
283

Homework Statement


A particle is under a central potential. Initially its wave function is an eigenfunction ##\psi## such that ##\hat {\vec L ^2} \psi = 2 \hbar ^2## , ##\hat L_3 \psi =0##.
Calculate the expectation value of ##\hat {\vec L}## for all times.

Homework Equations


##\frac{d}{dt}<\hat {\vec L}>=\frac{i}{\hbar } [\hat H , \hat {\vec L}]##.
I get that the quantum numbers of the eigenfunction are ##l=1##, ##m=0##. Not sure if that helps.

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the relevant equation, I get that ##\frac{d}{dt}<\hat {\vec L}>=0## because H commutes with L because it's a central potential problem. This means that the expectation value of the operator L is constant in time.
So I can calculate it at t=0, and use the information that at ##t=0##, ##\Psi (x,t=0)## is an eigenfunction (of the Hamiltonian but also of L^2 and L_z apparently).
So here's my problem: ##<\hat {\vec L}>(0)=<\psi , \hat {\vec L} \psi>##. I don't know how to calculate this. I've checked in Nouredine Zetilli's book because its said to have many solved problems but I couldn't find a single problem where one have to calculate the expected value of a vector operator such as ##\hat {\vec L}##.
Using intuition I guess I should rewrite that expectation value in terms of the expectation values of L^2 and L_z (=L_3) but I don't know how I could do this.

Here's an attempt: ##\hat {\vec L^2}=L_x^2+L_y^2+L_z^2##.
##\Rightarrow (L_x^2+L_y^2) \psi =2\hbar ^2 \psi##. Stuck here.

Here's another attempt: I want the expectation value of ##<L_x \hat i + L_y \hat j + L_z \hat k>##. I know I can't write this as ##<L_x>+<L_y>+<L_z>##. So I'm stuck here.

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fluidistic said:
Here's another attempt: I want the expectation value of ##<L_x \hat i + L_y \hat j + L_z \hat k>##. I know I can't write this as ##<L_x>+<L_y>+<L_z>##.

Well, obviously not, since it's a vector :smile:

But you can write it as \langle L_x \rangle \hat i+ \langle L_y \rangle \hat j + \langle L_z \rangle \hat k.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Oxvillian said:
Well, obviously not, since it's a vector :smile:

But you can write it as \langle L_x \rangle \hat i+ \langle L_y \rangle \hat j + \langle L_z \rangle \hat k.

I see thanks, with the last term being equal to 0.
So I am left with ##<\hat {\vec L}>=<L_x>\hat i + <L_y> \hat j##. I'm not sure on how to proceed.
 
Try expressing ##L_x## and ##L_y## in terms of ladder operators.
 
Oxvillian said:
Try expressing ##L_x## and ##L_y## in terms of ladder operators.
Oh right...
##L_x \psi =L_x |1,0>=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt 2} (|1,1>+|1,-1>)##. Similarly ##L_y=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt 2 i}(|1,1>+|1,-1>)##.
Then if the relation ##<L_x>=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt 2}(<|1,1>>+<|1,-1>>)## is true, then ##<L_x>=0## and ##<L_y>=0##.

This would make that ##<\hat { \vec L}>(t)=0 \hat i + 0 \hat j + 0 \hat k##.
So I am learning that the expectation value of a "vector operator" is actually a vector... I would have thought that the expectation value of anything would be a scalar!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K