Expectation value of momentum in discrete states

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the expectation value of momentum in discrete (bound) states, particularly focusing on proving that the expectation value

equals zero given the wave function. Participants explore various mathematical and theoretical approaches to this problem, including symmetry arguments, the implications of the Ehrenfest theorem, and the definitions of bound states in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about proving

    = 0 for a discrete state using the wave function, specifically through the integral of Psi*(x) Psi'(x).

  • Another participant questions whether the wave function of a bound state can always be chosen to be real.
  • A symmetry argument is presented, suggesting that if the wave function has even or odd symmetry, the expectation value <\Psi | p | \Psi> results in zero due to the odd symmetry of the momentum operator.
  • It is noted that parity may not always be a good quantum number in general cases.
  • A participant introduces the idea that

    can be related to the expectation value of the commutator [r/i,H], which vanishes for bound states in the absence of a magnetic field.

  • Another participant applies the Ehrenfest theorem to argue that

    = 0 for bound states, questioning the applicability of this argument for stationary states with E>0.

  • A distinction is made between orthodox and rigged Hilbert space formalisms regarding the existence of eigenstates corresponding to the continuous spectrum and the formation of expectation values.
  • A participant discusses the definition of a "bound state" in relation to simultaneous eigenkets of commuting operators and the implications of angular momentum conservation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the topic, with some agreeing on the validity of symmetry arguments while others highlight the limitations of parity as a quantum number. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of the Ehrenfest theorem and the definitions of bound states.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the wave functions and the conditions under which the arguments apply, particularly concerning the definitions of bound states and the treatment of continuous spectra.

Heirot
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
Is there any way of proving <p> = 0 for a discrete (bound) state given it's wave function? I've seen proofs using the hermitian properties of p but I'm interested in proving that the integral of Psi*(x) Psi'(x) is identically zero regardless of Psi(x) as long as it's a solution of Schroedinger's equation.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can the wave function of a bound state always be chosen to be real?
 
From symmetry arguments alone it is easy to prove.

If [tex]\Psi(x)[/tex] is even(odd) symmetry and [tex]p[/tex] is always odd, then [tex]<\Psi | p | \Psi>[/tex] is even*odd*even or odd*odd*odd either case is of odd symmetry which will always be zero over all space.
 
Yes, that's true, but in general case, parity need not be a good quantum number.
 
You could also argue that p/m is the expectation value of the commutator [r/i,H], at least when a magnetic field is absent. The expectation value of this operator vanishes for a bound state. When a magnetic field is present, you will have to consider also the hidden momentum of the field.
 
Let's see...

By Ehrenfest theorem we have <p>/m = d/dt <r> = 1/ih <[x,H]> = 1/ih <n|xH-Hx|n> = 1/ih E_n (<n|x|n> - <n|x|n>).
OK, so for bound states we have <n|x|n> = finite so <p> = 0. What about for stationary states with E>0? Why doesn't the argument apply there? Is <n|x|n> infinite or not defined well?
 
In orthodox Hilbert space formalism, there are no eigenstates corresponding to the continuous spectrum. In rigged Hilbert space formalism, they are defined, but, nevertheless, you are not allowed to form expectation values of them.
 
What do we mean by "bound state"? I guess a sinultaneous eigenket of a complete set of commuting operators, belonging to the discrete spectrum. If parity is in this set, then all is easy. Otherwise, take total angular momentum, this must be conserved for a physical system. Perform a pi-rotation around any axis. A bound state transforms by an inconsequential phase factor that goes out of the expectation value <psi|p|psi>, while p changes sign...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K