Expected value for the product of three dependent RV

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving an expression for the expected value of the product of three potentially dependent random variables (RV), specifically denoted as X, Y, and Z. Participants explore mathematical manipulations and theoretical frameworks related to covariance and expected values, with references to existing literature on the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on deriving the expected value for the product of three dependent RV, building on a previous manipulation for two RV provided by another participant.
  • Another participant suggests expanding the expected value of a product and substituting variables to facilitate the derivation.
  • A different participant expresses uncertainty about their interpretation and presents a series of mathematical expansions, ultimately questioning how to isolate the expected value without it appearing on both sides of the equation.
  • One participant discusses the covariance of products of random variables and provides a formula involving multiple substitutions and expectations, referencing specific literature for further reading.
  • A participant highlights the relevance of the discussion to the analysis of turbulent flow data and raises concerns about the assumptions required for deriving results from existing literature, particularly regarding independence and distribution types.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints and approaches to the problem, with no consensus reached on a definitive method for deriving the expected value for the product of three dependent RV. Disagreements and uncertainties regarding assumptions and interpretations of existing results are evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to assumptions about independence and distribution types, particularly in the context of non-normally distributed random variables. The discussion involves unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on definitions from referenced literature.

commish
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I want to derive an expression to compute the expected value for the product of three (potentially) dependent RV. In a separate thread, winterfors provided the manipulation at the bottom to arrive at such an expression for two RV.

Does anybody have any guidance on how I can take this a step further to establish a like expression for the product of THREE dependent RV? In other words, given three RV called X, Y, and Z, I want to derive:

[tex]E[X \cdot Y \cdot Z] = ...[/tex]


Thanks!


winterfors said:
No need to look at conditional PDFs. We have that:

[tex] Cov[X,Y] = E[(X-E[X])\cdot(Y-E[Y])][/tex]
[tex] = E[X \cdot Y] - E[X \cdot E[Y]] - E[E[X] \cdot Y] + E[E[X] \cdot E[Y]][/tex]
[tex]= E[X \cdot Y] - E[X] \cdot E[Y][/tex]

Thus,

[tex]E[X \cdot Y] = Cov[X,Y] + E[X] \cdot E[Y][/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Expand E[V.Z]. Then substitute X.Y for V.
 
I'm not sure if I interpreted you correctly. First, I expanded the original equation:

[tex] E(XV) &=& COV(X, V) + E(X) \cdot E(V) \\[/tex]

to get

[tex] E(XV) &=& E[(X-E(X)) \cdot (V-E(V))] + E(X) \cdot E(V) \\[/tex].

From here, I substituted YZ for V:

[tex] E(XYZ)&=& E[(X-E(X)) \cdot (YZ-E(YZ))] + E(X) \cdot E(YZ) \\[/tex]

[tex] E(XYZ) &=& E[XYZ- X E(YZ) - E(X) YZ + E(X) E(YZ)]+ E(X) E(YZ) [/tex],

which then reduces to:

[tex] E(XYZ) &=& E(XYZ) - (2 \cdot E(X) E(YZ)) + (2 \cdot E(X)E(YZ))[/tex].

And thus,

[tex] E(XYZ) &=& E(XYZ)[/tex].

This makes sense, but it gets me no closer to deriving an expression for E(XYZ) without having an E(XYZ) term on the RHS.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
 
When v = y z, C[x, v] - E[x] E[v] = C[x, y z] - E[x] E[y z] = C[x, y z] - E[x] (C[y, z] - E[y] E[z]) (last equality follows from E[y z] = C[y, z] - E[y] E[z]).

I can write C[x, y z] as C[1 x, y z]. In the following formula make the substitutions x = 1, y = x, u = y, v = z:

C[xy, uv] = Ex Eu C[y, u] + Ex Ev C[y, u] + Ey Eu C[x, v] + Ey Ev C[x, u]
+ E[(Dx)(Dy)(Du)(Dv)] + Ex E[(Dy)(Du)(Dv)] + Ey E[(Dx)(Du)(Dv)]
+ Eu E[(Dx)(Dy)(Dv)] + Ev E[(Dx)(Dy)(Du)] - C[x, y]C[u, v]

where Dx = x - Ex, etc., and Ex is a shorthand for E[x].

See:

Bohrnstedt, G. W., and A. S. Goldberger. 1969. On the exact covariance of products of random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 64: 1439–1442.

GRAY, GERRY. 1999. Covariances in Multiplicative Estimates. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128: 475–482.

Goodman, L. A. 1960. On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association 55: 708–713.
 
I appreciate the information given in the previous responses. I am looking at the analysis of turbulent flow data and this topic is extremely relevant. I have read and worked through the references posted. My main concern is that in order to derive the results of Bohrnstedt(?) (sorry) you seem to have to make the same assumptions for pairwise independent random variables as for normally distributed variables.
For random variables with zero expected value the result given in Bohrnstedt and Goldberger seems to imply that E[dx,dy,du,dv] can be factorized, even if the random variables are not normally distributed. The same result, in a somewhat different form, is quoted in Gerry Gray's paper. It would be very helpful to understand how to represent the covariance of products of four random variables when only some of them are independent and they are not normally distributed. Any references or textbooks would be helpful. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K