Experimental evidence of non-local quantum forces

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the experimental evidence of non-local quantum forces as presented in the paper by Becker et al. (2019), which investigates the Aharonov-Bohm effect and its implications for quantum mechanics. Participants explore the theoretical and experimental aspects of the findings, including the relationship between quantum forces and established quantum theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Becker et al. report an experiment that provides indirect evidence for a quantum "force" in the Aharonov-Bohm effect, suggesting a connection between Shelankov’s prediction and Zeilinger’s theorem.
  • Some participants note the use of quotation marks around "force" in the context of the findings, indicating a nuanced interpretation of the term.
  • One participant challenges the interpretation of previous literature, asserting that Batelaan's earlier work incorrectly concluded the absence of quantum forces in the Aharonov-Bohm effect, and suggests that exposure to the quantum potential has shifted perspectives.
  • Another participant argues that the Aharonov-Bohm effect can be analyzed without reference to Bohmian mechanics or non-local interactions, suggesting a framework based on quantum electrodynamics (QED) which is characterized by local interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of Bohmian mechanics for understanding the Aharonov-Bohm effect and the implications of the experimental findings. There is no consensus on the interpretation of quantum forces or the relevance of previous literature.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on interpretations of quantum mechanics, the ambiguity surrounding the term "force," and the unresolved nature of the relationship between the experimental results and established theories.

Auto-Didact
Messages
747
Reaction score
554
TL;DR
Batelaan et al. have carried out an experiment confirming Shelankov's prediction that the Aharonov-Bohm effect is in fact not dispersionless as thought before due to Zeilinger's results.
Becker et al. 2019, Asymmetry and non-dispersivity in the Aharonov-Bohm effect
Abstract said:
Decades ago, Aharonov and Bohm showed that electrons are affected by electromagnetic potentials in the absence of forces due to fields. Zeilinger’s theorem describes this absence of classical force in quantum terms as the “dispersionless” nature of the Aharonov-Bohm effect. Shelankov predicted the presence of a quantum “force” for the same Aharonov-Bohm physical system as elucidated by Berry. Here, we report an experiment designed to test Shelankov’s prediction and we provide a theoretical analysis that is intended to elucidate the relation between Shelankov’s prediction and Zeilinger’s theorem. The experiment consists of the Aharonov-Bohm physical system; free electrons pass a magnetized nanorod and far-field electron diffraction is observed. The diffraction pattern is asymmetric confirming one of Shelankov’s predictions and giving indirect experimental evidence for the presence of a quantum “force”. Our theoretical analysis shows that Zeilinger’s theorem and Shelankov’s result are both special cases of one theorem.
The paper is open access and published in Nature Communications.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that rightfully they set "force" always in quotation marks. Bohmian mechanics is interesting in this context but not necessary to understand the observations and theory of the AB effect.
 
Did you read the paper? Batelaan's prior work is part of the very literature which incorrectly demonstrated that there were no quantum forces in the AB effect, whether or not the word force is in scare quotes.

He has recently even admitted that his old perspective based upon his prior ignorance of the existence of the quantum potential - no doubt an affliction most experts in QM still suffer from - changed with exposure to the concept.
 
Well, I've not analyzed the paper in detail, but I'm pretty sure the AB effect investigated there can be analyzed very well without any reference to Bohmian mechanics and also within QED, which has by construction only local interactions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
521
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
25K
  • · Replies 140 ·
5
Replies
140
Views
14K
  • · Replies 171 ·
6
Replies
171
Views
19K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K