Experimental evidence on cosmological redshift

[PeterDonis]

The following articles

Are not valid references.

 

[PeroK]

Big Bang is the prevailing model of the universe. What you are saying is believed by most people. However, the idea that the observable universe expanded from a tiny point of Planck length (1.6×10^-35 m) to the present radius of 4.4×10²⁶ m (46.5 Gly) is so overwhelming that some people may have traces of uncertainties back in their minds.

A lot of scientific discoveries are overwhelming. That a single fertilised egg can develop into a fully grown human being. The evolution of life including intelligent, conscious humans.

That the solar system evolved from a cloud of dust. Even that there are trillions of galaxies each with hundreds of billions of stars.

It's not a good argument against a theory simply to say that the theory is mind boggling.

 

[JimJCW]

Big Bang is the prevailing model of the universe. What you are saying is believed by most people. However, the idea that the observable universe expanded from a tiny point of Planck length (1.6×10^-35 m) to the present radius of 4.4×10²⁶ m (46.5 Gly) is so overwhelming that some people may have traces of uncertainties back in their minds.

The following articles related to expansion of space [have been deleted by the moderators since they are not valid references.]

Please see Wendy Freedman’s 2021 paper, Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective, in The Astrophysical Journal.

 

[Vanadium 50]

Why are you arguing with yourself?

 

[JimJCW]

Why are you arguing with yourself?

If I seem to be not committed, it’s because I wish to find the truth.