Experiments to distinguish 3-body and 2-body decays?

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13
I was wondering are there any experiments to distinguish between 2 and 3-body decays? For example, consider decay of the muon and the pion:
7RsFo.jpg


The pion only emits 1 muon neutrino ("missing energy") and 1 muon. The muon however, emits 1 muon neutrino, 1 electron neutrino and 1 electron.

How is it established experimentally that the pion only emits 1 neutrino whereas the muon emits 2 neutrinos?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, there are experiments to see the neutrinos, but you can measure the energy spectrum of the visible decay product: a two.body decay produces all muons at the same energy (in the pion rest frame), in a three-body decay you get a continuous energy spectrum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom
In the rest frame of the pion the muon will carry an energy of [itex]E_\mu=\dfrac{m_\pi}{2}[/itex].
In the same result for the muon the electron will have to carry less energy...
 
mfb said:
there are experiments to see the neutrinos,
^ also that ^_^ however I don't know whether there are experiments actually going on with muon decays...
 
mfb said:
Well, there are experiments to see the neutrinos, but you can measure the energy spectrum of the visible decay product: a two.body decay produces all muons at the same energy (in the pion rest frame), in a three-body decay you get a continuous energy spectrum.

Why is it that in a 2 body decay all muons are produced at the same energy? Since ##E_{cm} = E_\nu + E_\mu##, shouldn't there be a spectrum as well?
 
In the rest frame of the pion you initially have a four-momentum:

[itex]P_{in} = \begin{pmatrix} m_\pi \\ \vec{0} \end{pmatrix}~~,~~P_{fin}= \begin{pmatrix} E_\mu + E_\nu \\ \vec{p}_\mu + \vec{p}_\nu \end{pmatrix}~~,~~ E_\nu = \sqrt{|p_\nu|^2 + m_\nu^2} \approx |p_\nu|[/itex]

conservation of momentum tells you that:
[itex]\vec{p}_\nu = -\vec{p}_\mu \Rightarrow E_\nu = |\vec{p}_\mu|[/itex]

So you have:
[itex]P_{fin}= \begin{pmatrix} E_\mu + |\vec{p}_\mu| \\ \vec{0} \end{pmatrix}[/itex]

Take the square equality (I am not sure whether my equations are correct BUT by the fact that I already wrote that [itex]\vec{p}_\nu = - \vec{p}_\mu[/itex] you should already get your answer- in particular they should be fixed numbers for the given decay since you can only have 1 variable):
[itex]E_\mu^2 + |p_\mu|^2 + 2 E_\mu |p_\mu| = m_\pi^2[/itex]
[itex]2 |p_\mu|^2 + 2E_\mu |p_\mu| = m_\pi^2 - m_\mu^2[/itex]
[itex]\sqrt{m_\mu^2 + |p_\mu|^2}= \dfrac{ m_\pi^2 - m_\mu^2}{2|p_\mu|}- |p_\mu|[/itex]
[itex]m_\mu^2 + |p_\mu|^2 = \Big( \dfrac{ m_\pi^2 - m_\mu^2}{2|p_\mu|}\Big)^2+ |p_\mu|^2- (m_\pi^2 - m_\mu^2)[/itex]
[itex]m_\mu^2 +(m_\pi^2 - m_\mu^2)= \dfrac{ (m_\pi^2 - m_\mu^2)^2}{4|p_\mu|^2}[/itex]

[itex]|p_\mu|= \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\dfrac{ (m_\pi^2 - m_\mu^2)^2}{m_\mu^2 +(m_\pi^2 - m_\mu^2)}}[/itex]
which is a fixed number and so is the muon energy...
Forget my m_pi/2 that would be the case for equally massive produced particles.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom and unscientific
In a 3 body decay [itex]1 \rightarrow 2+3+4[/itex] the condition for momentum conservation in the rest frame of 1 would be:
[itex]\vec{p}_2= - \vec{p}_3 - \vec{p}_4[/itex]
Which doesn't give a fixed number anymore , you can change 3 and 4 freely to keep the equality. In particular if I say that [itex]\vec{p}_3,\vec{p}_4[/itex] are such to give the equality right, then [itex]\vec{p}_3^\prime= \vec{p}_3 +\vec{a}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{p}_4^\prime= \vec{p}_4 - \vec{a}[/itex] can still keep the equality. This gives an ambiguity in the momenta and so the energies which results in a continuous spectrum.

That is a general fact difference between 2 and 3 body decays, and it was the reason why neutrinos were first demonstrated.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom and unscientific
ChrisVer said:
That is a general fact difference between 2 and 3 body decays, and it was the reason why neutrinos were first demonstrated.
Good point.

Another way to see the difference:
2-body decay: let the x-direction be along the motion of one particle, the other will then move in negative x direction. You get two unknowns (the momenta of the two particle), and two conservation laws - energy and momentum. The result is a single solution.
3-body decay: suddenly you get 1+2+2 unknowns (you have to take the second dimension into account), and only 3 conservation laws (energy, and momentum in two dimensions). That leaves two degrees of freedom for the decay mechanism.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K