Explaining a Physics Phenomenon with a Snowy Photo

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on explaining a physics phenomenon observed in a snowy photo for a contest. The user describes how wet snow accumulated on a play set, creating a parabolic arch after sliding down due to exceeding the normal force. They propose that the weight of the snow overcame the normal force, while friction slowed its descent, causing it to freeze in place. Participants suggest that the shape is more accurately described as hyperbolic rather than parabolic and offer to help derive the mathematical explanation. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clear qualitative and quantitative understanding of the forces at play.
Jstuff
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have to submit a photo for a physics contest. I was thinking of using the picture in the attached, but I'm having trouble trying to figure out how to explain it in terms of physics. The background on the picture is: We had a very wet snow and as the snow built up on top it got to heavy and slid down the side of the play set but it stopped and created and sort of parabolic arch with supporting the middle. ( See attached picture.)


The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking I could say as the snow accumulated on top of the play set the normal force was eventually exceeded by weight of the snow. As it was sliding down the frictional forces slowed it to a slow enough pace that the snow froze in place.
Is there anything wrong with this statement? Also, are there any other forces I should take into account?
Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • last palm pics 100.jpg
    last palm pics 100.jpg
    34.6 KB · Views: 390
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite parabolic, try hyperbolic!
 
Thanks, but why exactly? Also, does anyone have any other ideas?
 
Well, I could derive why it produces a hyperbolic cosine here, if you like? With regards to a qualitative explanation, I'm sure someone else can provide a clearer answer than myself.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top