B Explaining Cosmic Inflation using analogies

Paolo 2008
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Cosmic Inflation might be explained to the average person using simpler analogies.
An analogy to understand Cosmic Inflation: If the universe grew in size from a subatomic size to the size of a tennis ball (or softball) in a tiny fraction of a second, then a football inflated at the same rate will grow to an approximate size of our solar system. Is this a correct analogy? Wouldn't the football grow to several billion times our solar system? Or just one solar system is more approximate to a plausible analogy?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Here is another analogy I found on Space.com "During this period, the universe doubled in size at least 90 times, going from subatomic-sized to golf-ball-sized almost instantaneously". So, I was wondering if we double a football 90 times, would it grow to be the size of the solar system? Or way larger, I calculated it to be something in the vicinity of 10^25 meters in diameter. Anybody agrees or am I miscalculating?
 
Without even doing any calculation I can see that it is definitely in the right ballpark in terms of orders of magnitude, which means it is MANY orders of magnitude larger than the milky way, to say nothing of being a bit larger than the solar system.

The magnitude of inflation is, to my mind, literally incomprehensible. It's just numbers. I don't mean to suggest that it's not correct, just that it is WAY far outside of human understanding as anything other than numbers.
 
Paolo 2008 said:
Summary: Cosmic Inflation might be explained to the average person using simpler analogies.

An analogy to understand Cosmic Inflation: If the universe grew in size from a subatomic size to the size of a tennis ball (or softball) in a tiny fraction of a second, then a football inflated at the same rate will grow to an approximate size of our solar system. Is this a correct analogy? Wouldn't the football grow to several billion times our solar system? Or just one solar system is more approximate to a plausible analogy?
Some caution. Would it not be better to rather say that the observable universe grew exponentially from subatomic size to a softball size in a tiny fraction of a second. There were probably many, even infinitely many such regions, making up the Universe. Then, without specifying times for simplicity, one can say that a phase transition happened, dumping some of that kinetic energy into particles of matter, bringing the inflation period to an end. From there on it was just decelerating expansion, until dark energy lately again started pushing the observable universe towards exponential expansion again.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and PeroK
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top