MHB Explaining Dimensions of Tanagrams Without Midpoint Assumptions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the dimensions of Tangram pieces without making midpoint assumptions. The user has identified the dimensions of two large congruent isosceles right triangles based on the overall square's dimensions of 1 unit by 1 unit. They utilized the Pythagorean theorem to calculate the lengths of the triangle legs, concluding that the dimensions of the square are (√2)/4. The user seeks further clarification on explaining the dimensions of the remaining shapes, including a square and a parallelogram, while adhering to the constraint of not assuming midpoints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Tangram geometry and shapes
  • Familiarity with the Pythagorean theorem
  • Basic knowledge of isosceles right triangles
  • Ability to visualize geometric arrangements without midpoint assumptions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of isosceles right triangles in depth
  • Learn how to apply the Pythagorean theorem in various geometric contexts
  • Investigate the relationships between angles and sides in squares and parallelograms
  • Study methods for calculating dimensions without relying on midpoint assumptions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in geometry, mathematicians working with Tangrams, and anyone interested in geometric proofs and dimensional analysis.

jljarrett18
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am currently working on an assignment using Tanagrams. I have the information that I have:
• 2 large, and congruent, isosceles right triangles
• 1 medium isosceles right triangle
• 2 small, and congruent, isosceles right triangles
• 1 square
• 1 parallelogram

The pieces can be rearranged with no gaps or overlapping of shapes into a square with dimensions 1 unit by 1 unit (i.e., the entire area of the square is 1 unit^{2})

I have figured out all the dimensions of the pieces but I need to explain how I came up with them. The only thing is you cannot make midpoint assumptions (e.g. B is the midpoint between A and C). I used this assumption in determining the dimensions so I need a new way to explain the dimensions. I have already explained how I got the 2 large congruent isosceles triangles, but I am stuck.
I have attached a picture of the tanagram

This is what I have so far for my explanation:


The way that I determined the dimensions of each of the 7 shapes was by the information within the task. The information given says that the dimension of the whole square is 1 unit by 1 unit. So for the two large congruent isosceles triangles (segment AJ and JK) the one side is 1 unit because the one side takes up the whole side of the square as you can see by the 1 in red. Next, I tried to determine the dimension of the other two legs. By Theorem 6 of Pythagorean theorem: A triangle is a right triangle if and only if the sum of the squares of the two smaller legs equal the square of the largest leg; so (UCertify, n.a). Next what I did was plugged in 1 for C and squared it which is 1. Since the triangles are isosceles that mean both sides are congruent and equal. So, I divided 1 by 2 and then took the square root to find out what the two sides are which are
 

Attachments

  • task 2  puzzle.png
    task 2 puzzle.png
    4.5 KB · Views: 193
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What you have done so far is to identify the dimensions of the two big triangles $AFJ$ and $JFK$. I think that you should next look at the square $BDFE$. Draw its diagonal $BF$. You know that $F$ is the centre of the square $ACKJ$, and you know that the angles $BFD$ and $FAJ$ are both $45^\circ$. It follows that $BF$ is parallel to $AJ$, and you should be able to conclude that the length of $BF$ is $\frac12$. Then use Pythagoras to find the lengths of the sides of the square $BDFE$, and deduce that $B$ is indeed the midpoint of $AC.$

[Spelling suggestion: the name of these shapes is Tangrams, with two a's, not three.]
 
So now I can prove the dimensions of square are (√2)/4. With that information I then can fill in the rest of the shapes of the tangrams because I know one length of the square?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
54K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K