Explaining Positive Charge Higher Potential than Negative Charge

  • Thread starter Thread starter tsgkl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electrostatic potential, specifically addressing why a positive charge is considered to have a higher potential than a negative charge. The original poster expresses confusion regarding this concept as presented in their textbook.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of electrostatic potential and its implications, questioning the relationship between charge types and potential. There are attempts to derive the formula for electrostatic potential and discussions about the work done in moving charges in an electric field.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the definitions and implications of electrostatic potential. Some have provided guidance on deriving relevant formulas and considering the effects of electric fields on charge movement. Multiple interpretations of the concepts are being explored without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to textbook definitions and the need to clarify the relationship between positive and negative charges in terms of potential. There is an emphasis on deriving understanding rather than applying existing formulas directly.

tsgkl
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

is
it is given in my high school textbook that a positive charge is that higher potential than negative charge? i am not able to understant it...can anyone please explain...

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at your formula for potential. What happens if you replace q with -q?
 
Last edited:
Start with the definition of electrostatic potential. What is it?
 
well the definition says,"electrostatic potential at any point in a region of electrostatic field is the minimum work done in carrying a unit positive charge(without acceleration) from infinity to that point"
 
Yes. Calculate the work done in bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to that point. Do you know the electric field produced by a point charge as a function of radius?
 
calculating the work done in bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to that point in a region of electrostatic field will mean deriving formula formula for electrostatic potential due to a point charge... so you mean to say what dreamlord said that is replace q with -q in the electrostatic potential formula due to a point charge... electric field varies inversly to square of radius...
 
Yes, I am asking you to do what DimReg asked you to do in post #2, except derive it instead of using the formula.

Another way of looking it is in terms of 'upstream' and 'downstream' field lines. Consider a unit positive charge in space. When you have a charge +q at the origin, you will have to apply a force to the test charge to move it 'upstream' against the field lines. This will raise the energy of the system. On the other hand, if you have a charge -q, you can simply leave the unit positive charge and it will move 'downstream' with the field lines. This will reduce the energy of the system as the test charge will gain kinetic energy.

Basically, when there is repulsion, the potential energy increase, and when there is attraction, the energy decreases, because the system achieves a more stable state.
 
so this will mean +16v will be greater than -18v even though magnitude wise 18 is greater than 16...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K