Explaining to middle and high schoolers the alternatives to retrocausality

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter whitsona2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Retrocausality
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around explaining alternatives to retrocausality in the context of quantum entanglement and quantum eraser experiments, particularly for middle and high school students. The focus is on understanding the implications of these experiments and the interpretations of their results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions conducting a quantum entanglement experiment and a quantum eraser experiment, indicating that physicists suggest these phenomena may resemble retrocausality, but this is not a definitive conclusion.
  • Another participant requests clarification on the specific quantum eraser experiment being referenced, noting that explanations can vary significantly depending on the experiment's setup.
  • A detailed explanation of the Kim (delayed choice) experiment is provided, highlighting that the 'erased pattern' is a result of correlating observations rather than actual erasure of information.
  • One participant confirms the experiment involved polarized light and expresses intent to understand the referenced materials better.
  • A link to a related thread is shared, suggesting it may provide further insights into the delayed choice and retrocausality discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the alternative explanations to retrocausality, as multiple interpretations and clarifications are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific experiments and interpretations that may depend on the definitions and assumptions used, and some steps in the explanations are noted as potentially missing or unresolved.

whitsona2
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I run a maker space and it has taken a dive into physics recently. I have 2 students doing a quantum entanglement experiment from SciAm and the Spooky Action at a Distance website. And, we have done a simple quantum eraser with polarized light.

All I can tell them is that "physicists say" that this looks like retrocausality, but it probably isn't.

Can you help me with what that alternative explanation is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give an indication of what the experiment was?

There are a number of different quantum eraser experiments, and explanations of what is going on vary. For instance, in the Kim (delayed choice) experiment the explanation is that nothing is erased. The pattern that is formed by signal photons is a superposition of a non-interference pattern and an interference pattern, and the thing that we call the 'erased pattern' ie the non-interference pattern that arises from photons whose idler went through a path that enabled detection of 'which-path' info, is only visible by correlating the observations of the signal photons with the observations of the idler photons.

If it was the one where you start with a double slit that gives an interference pattern, and then you put linear polarising filters in front of the slits, with the angle between the polarisation direction of the two being 90 degrees, then there's a derivation of why that works here. The linked post doesn't contain the full proof because there's a last step missing, which is what the thread is asking about. The last step is supplied in post 4 of that thread. As I recall, one doesn't need any fancy quantum mechanics for the proof, only electromagnetic wave equations. So it might be accessible to maths-savvy school students. The simple 'words-only' explanation is that the polarising plates change the waves passing through the two slits so that they do not interfere with one another.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: whitsona2
Yes! It was the polarized light one. Thanks. I'll try to grok this and the Kim paper reference today. Than you! I hope B was the right destination for "high school help needed" on the phone app and can't find the key that tells which is which.
 

Similar threads

Replies
119
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K