We can't unite QM with GR because of what the Qfield is capable of

[quantuminternet]

TL;DR Summary

Do all of our problems uniting QM with GR have to do with what the quantum field is capable of?

I think it can do more than the wave only events we know of (superposition, entanglement, and tunneling).

If the quantum field doesn't care about spatial distance, does that mean every unobserved quantum wave is already everywhere throughout the quantum field? Does it explain spooky action at a distance and the delayed choice quantum eraser?
I think we are going to find the Quantum Field is a bit like the internet cloud. All Quantum waves have access to it.

Does a quantum wave, that is destined to decohere, behave differently than one that isn't?

Decay of Coherence is something that can happen to decoherent particles. Coherent matter-waves do not decay.

The reason decoherence can be predestined is because the quantum field is everywhere and already knows of the decoherece events.
Unobserved waves do not travel in spatial dimensions.

The delayed choice quantum eraser demonstrates a particle of a pair landing on its final panel first, knowing if it's entangled brother will decohere in its path.

 

[PeterDonis]

If the quantum field doesn't care about spatial distance

Why do you think it doesn't?

 

[DrChinese]

Summary:: Do all of our problems uniting QM with GR have to do with what the quantum field is capable of?

I think it can do more than the wave only events we know of (superposition, entanglement, and tunneling).
...

You are new to posting here. You might not be aware that most personal speculation is not allowed. Further, you should provide a more specific reference (or more standard terminology) to enable someone to answer.

The possible unification of QM/QFT and GR is a very big subject. Many attempts have been made to unify them, certainly more than could be discussed in a single thread. Perhaps you might find a way to rephrase your questions into something that invites a more specific answer.

Cheers!

 

[Dale]

With that we will close this thread. Please be aware that interpretations questions belong in the interpretations sub forum, and that in that sub forum it is more important than most sections to have your posts be properly supported by the professional scientific literature