Explanation for integration of Dr/Dt

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integration of the equation $$\frac{D^2\mathbf r}{Dt^2}=−2\mathbf w \times \frac{D\mathbf r}{Dt}−g\mathbf R$$ leads to the expression $$\frac{D\mathbf r}{Dt}= \mathbf v_0 −2\mathbf w×(\mathbf r−\mathbf r_0)−gt\mathbf R$$. This derivation involves taking the definite integral of both sides of the second-order differential equation, resulting in a relationship between the time derivative of the position vector and initial conditions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the transformation from body coordinates to the inertial frame in the context of vector calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus and differential equations
  • Familiarity with the concepts of body and inertial coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of the operator $$\frac{D}{Dt}$$ for material derivatives
  • Experience with integrating vector functions over time
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the material derivative in fluid dynamics
  • Learn about the role of rotation vectors in dynamics
  • Explore the integration techniques for vector functions in physics
  • Investigate the implications of initial conditions in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on dynamics and kinematics, as well as engineers working with motion analysis and vector calculus.

harmyder
Messages
31
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Why integration of $$\frac{D^2\mathbf r}{Dt^2}=−2\mathbf w \times \frac{D\mathbf r}{Dt}−g\mathbf R$$ gives us
$$\frac{D\mathbf r}{Dt}= \mathbf v_0 −2\mathbf w×(\mathbf r−\mathbf r_0)−gt\mathbf R$$


Homework Equations



Consider a time-varying vector written in the body coordinate system, \xi(t) = R(t)\mathbf s(t).
$$\frac{d\xi}{dt} = R\frac{d\mathbf s}{dt}+\mathbf w \times \xi = \frac{D\xi}{Dt} +\mathbf w \times \xi.$$

The Attempt at a Solution


It looks for me like they incorporated -\mathbf v_0 for LHS and -\mathbf r_0 for \frac{D\mathbf r}{Dt}.

Ah! Probably they took definite integral \int_0^t!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, if you take ##\int_{0}^{t} \cdot ds## (as you said at the end) of both sides of ## \frac{D^{2} \mathbf{r}}{Ds^2}=-2\mathbf{w}\times \frac{D\mathbf{r}}{Ds}-g\mathbf{R}## you obtain in the first side ## \frac{D \mathbf{r}}{Ds}(t)-\frac{D \mathbf{r}}{Ds}(0)## that is problably ##\frac{D \mathbf{r}}{Ds}(t)-\mathbf{v}_{0}##, the second side is a simple integration and calling ##\mathbf{r}=\mathbf{r}(t)## and ##\mathbf{r}_{0}=\mathbf{r}(0)## you have the result ...

Ssnow
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K