Explanation for Rayleigh Criterion?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ameliatqy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation Rayleigh
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Rayleigh Criterion defines the resolution limit for optical systems, stating that two point sources are resolvable when the maxima of their diffraction patterns coincide with the first minima of the other. This criterion is expressed mathematically as an angle of 1.22λ/d, where λ is the wavelength of light and d is the aperture diameter. While the Rayleigh Criterion is widely used, it is not the only resolution criterion; alternatives such as the Sparrow criterion and the Johnson criterion exist, each applicable under different conditions and for various imaging systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical diffraction and interference patterns
  • Familiarity with the concepts of wavelength (λ) and aperture diameter (d)
  • Knowledge of different resolution criteria in optics
  • Basic principles of imaging systems and detectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Sparrow criterion and its applications in optical resolution
  • Explore the Johnson criterion for sampled imaging systems
  • Study the mathematical derivation of the Rayleigh Criterion
  • Investigate practical implications of resolution limits in astronomical imaging
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, physicists, and anyone involved in imaging technology or astronomy will benefit from understanding the Rayleigh Criterion and its alternatives for resolving power in optical systems.

ameliatqy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Explanation for Rayleigh Criterion??

I just want to ask what is the reason behind Rayleigh criterion which states that items are just resolved when the maxima of a diffraction pattern coincides with the first minima of the other diffraction pattern. I have tried finding the answer but to no avail. Can anyone help?

Thank you for your help in advance!
 
Science news on Phys.org


Everyone's eyesight is different. Some people can probably resolve apart two 'Airy discs' if they are a little closer together than the RC, others might need them to be somewhat further apart than the RC. The RC is a handy 'rule of thumb', rather than having a strict optical basis. And, as a rule of thumb, it's very easy to use: you can simply say that two stars (or whatever) are resolvable (resoluble?) if they're separated by an angle of 1.22\frac{\lambda}{d}, in which \lambda is the wavelength of the light and d is the aperture diameter.
 


This is a practical definition that ensures the presence of a noticeable dip between the two peaks, and makes the heights of the peaks correct since each is summed with zero from the other.

The Rayleigh criterion is just one choice for resolution, however--others exist as well, each with their own rationale.
 


A picture is worth 1000 words:

rayc.gif

(From http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/raylei.html )
 


ameliatqy said:
I just want to ask what is the reason behind Rayleigh criterion which states that items are just resolved when the maxima of a diffraction pattern coincides with the first minima of the other diffraction pattern. I have tried finding the answer but to no avail. Can anyone help?

Thank you for your help in advance!

Perhaps it's worth noting that the Rayleigh criterion is not the only criterion for resolvability, it's simply the one developed during the era of film (continuous detectors) and applies to mutually incoherent (independent) sources. Two other important criteria in use today are the Sparrow criterion:

http://www.opticsinfobase.org/view_...eq=0&mobile=no&org=Cleveland State University

http://www.biomachina.org/courses/structures/082.pdf

And the Johnson criterion, which is appropriate for sampled imaging systems:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson's_criteria
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K