Explanation needed in angular acceleration

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating angular acceleration and average angular velocity for a disk rotating with constant angular acceleration. The problem states that the disk rotates 25 radians in 5 seconds, and participants clarify that the correct value for θ in the equation θ = ω0t + 1/2αt^2 is indeed the total angle of 25 radians, not the average angular velocity. The average angular velocity is calculated as 25 rad/5 s, resulting in 5 rad/s. This value is essential for further calculations regarding angular acceleration and instantaneous angular velocity. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
Schwatt!
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I am doing some homework from my textbook and I encountered this problem:

"Starting from rest, a disk rotates about its central axis with constant angular acceleration. In 5.0 s, it rotates 25 rad. During that time, what are the magnitudes of (a) the angular acceleration and (b) the average angular velocity? (c) Wha is the instantaneous angular velocity of the disk at the end of the 5.0 s? (d) With the angular acceleration unchanged, through what additional angle will the disk turn during the next 5.0s?"

I have a problem calculating the value for (a). I have the answer but I am not sure why I am right. Using θ = ω0t+ 1/2αt^2 and solving for a, what is the value to be used for θ? Would it be the given 25 rad. or 25 rad/5 s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\theta is an angle, not an angular velocity.

If all else fails, use unit analysis to check what you should plug in.
 
ok so that would mean to plug in the radian measure but that number does not give the answer; the 25/5 does...
 
Schwatt! said:
ok so that would mean to plug in the radian measure but that number does not give the answer; the 25/5 does...
The 25/5 is the correct quantity, that is what Saketh was hinting at. Since;

\omega=\frac{d\theta}{dt} = \frac{25}{5} = 5\;rad.s^{-1}
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K