Explicit Formula for Sum of Series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an explicit formula for the sum of the first n terms of a series consisting of the reciprocals of natural numbers: 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, etc. This series is identified as a harmonic series, which complicates the search for a straightforward formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various attempts to identify a pattern in the sums of the first few terms and question the existence of a simple formula for the sum. Some suggest that the series diverges when considered to infinity, while others focus on the finite case.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have offered insights into the nature of the harmonic series and its lack of a simple formula, while others are questioning the assumptions about the series and its summation.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the distinction between the sum of n terms and the infinite series. Participants are also considering the implications of using factorials and least common multiples in their reasoning.

Andy111
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine an explicit formula for the sum of n terms for the given series:

1, [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex], [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex], [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex], [tex]\frac{1}{5}[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the first 5 terms for the sum sequence and got:

1, [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex], [tex]\frac{11}{6}[/tex], [tex]\frac{25}{12}[/tex], [tex]\frac{137}{60}[/tex]

but I can't find a pattern to determine an explicit formula.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your question, but wouldn't it just be [tex]\sum_{n=1}^\infty 1/n[/tex] ?
 
The question asks for n terms, not an infinite number of terms
 
Oh, sorry. I read the original post too quickly.
 
That's alright, nothing to bash heads in about! As for the problem, it's a doozy...
 
You're right, it is a doozy! This series is known as a harmonic series, and according to http://plus.maths.org/issue12/features/harmonic/index.html" , "there is no simple formula, akin to the formulae for the sums of arithmetic and geometric series, for the sum."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well then wouldn't it just be:

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k}[/tex]

[tex]S_1=1[/tex]

[tex]S_2=1+\frac{1}{2}=\frac{2+1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]S_3=1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}=\frac{6+3+2}{6}[/tex]

[tex]S_4=1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{4}=\frac{12+6+4+3}{12}[/tex]

blah, that doesn't actually seem to work!
 
I know! It's whack!

I started out trying to find formulas for numerator and denominator separately. In cases where it doesn't simplify, the denominator is n! . As for the numerator, aside from the obvious (n! + n!/2 + n!/3+...+n!/n) I do not see how to arrive at a formula.
 
According to http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HarmonicSeries.html you can write it as a sum of the Euler-Mascheroni constant and a digamma function. I'm guessing if there were an easier expression they would have mentioned it. I think steelphantom is right, there is no elementary formula.
 
  • #10
I think all it is is sigma from k=2 to n of 1/n. very simple that would start off with one half then one third then one quarter and so on.
 
  • #11
That much is obvious. The trouble is finding a formula for the nth partial sum.
 
  • #12
I think it's impossible, infinity would be the common denominator.
 
  • #13
beanny007 said:
I think it's impossible, infinity would be the common denominator.
Not for the sum of n (a finite number) terms.
 
  • #14
beanny007 said:
I think it's impossible, infinity would be the common denominator.

The denominator ought to be the lcm(1,2,...,n) whereas the numerator is the puzzle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
10K