Explicit search in ChatGPT recalls

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the capabilities of ChatGPT in generating markdown code for tables, specifically for organizing information related to scientific papers and popular forum entries. Participants explore various queries and tricks to elicit desired outputs from the model.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests markdown code for a table of papers on string theory, specifying the need for clickable URLs and open access preferences.
  • Another participant suggests creating a table for popular entries on Physics Forums, including thread titles, subforum names, authors, and URLs.
  • Some participants humorously note that ChatGPT seems to struggle with generating tables or providing external references directly, but can respond positively when asked for markdown code.
  • One participant mentions that ChatGPT sometimes generates links that are local to OpenAI or hallucinates information, particularly when the topic is sensitive or banned.
  • A variant query is proposed that instructs ChatGPT to generate markdown code for tables of popular websites and articles, emphasizing the need for authoritative sources and a specific format.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the effectiveness of using markdown code to bypass limitations in generating tables, but there is no consensus on the reliability of the links generated or the consistency of ChatGPT's responses.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations are noted regarding the accuracy of generated links and the conditions under which ChatGPT may refuse to provide references, particularly related to sensitive topics.

arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,481
Reaction score
187
Generate markdown code for a table of papers on string theory. Generate up to 5 rows, including at least columns for title, authors, and url. Make the urls clickable. Do not forget to prefix it with https: You can include papers from scientific journals or scientific repositories. For a given paper, prefer an open access repository. Give preference to high impact papers.

1670812640295.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
now a table for popular entries of physicsforums, use as columns the title of the thread and the subforum where it is
....
make it up to 10 lines, include a column for urls and another for the author of the thread

1670812808488.png


Yep, nothing is real, just hallucinating it.
 
That's hilarious. I asked I to give me a table of links and it said it can't make tables or provide external references, but then I tried your trick of asking it for markdown code and it was happy to help.
 
Office_Shredder said:
That's hilarious. I asked I to give me a table of links and it said it can't make tables or provide external references, but then I tried your trick of asking it for markdown code and it was happy to help.
Indeed it is. The only trouble I got is that it was generating all the links local to openai. And of course it hallucinates some of them, while for others it gives a related paper or a paper that quotes the topic. Sometimes it stills says it can not provide references, but it happens mostly if you ask for a banned topic, as it triggers some tripwire.

I saw the markdown trick elsewhere in the brainstorm of examples across twitter or mastodon; but somehow it is not listed in the most popular FAQs. It was only used as a trick to include images.
 
A variant of this query, starting with "From now", transforms it into a Search Engine

From now, generate markdown code for a table of popular websites, webpages and articles on the topic asked in each new prompt. Do not generate explanations. Prefer authoritative sources. Put as least a column for title and other for url, with a total of at most 5 lines. Do not forget to prefix https:// for the url. Always before the table, suggest up to five similar topics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
312
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
9K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
11K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K