When working with fourier transforms in Quantum mechanics you get the result that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-ikx}e^{ik'x} = \delta(k-k')[/tex]

I understand conceptually why this must be true, since you are taking the fourier transform of a plane wave with a single frequency element.

I have also seen it sort of derived by looking at the formula for the fourier series and tracking its components in the limit that it becomes a continuous fourier transorm (letting the period go to infinity and [tex]\Delta\omega[/tex] go to 0)

But I really want to come up with some explicit expression, from doing the integral that behaves like a delta function. I have tried messing around with it, by sticking it inside of another integral and multiplying it by a test function etc. Is there a way to do this?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Explicitly Deriving the Delta Function

Loading...

Similar Threads - Explicitly Deriving Delta | Date |
---|---|

A Hermitian conjugate of the derivative of a wave function | Feb 21, 2018 |

At most explicit time-dependent operator | Jun 28, 2014 |

Explicit form of scalar propagator | Nov 10, 2013 |

Lagrangian explicitly preserves symmetries of a theory? | Aug 25, 2013 |

Explicit form for representing two spin 1/2 system | Apr 3, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**