Explicitly Deriving the Delta Function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the explicit derivation of the delta function, particularly in the context of Fourier transforms in quantum mechanics. Participants explore various approaches to express the delta function through integrals and examine the properties and definitions associated with it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the integral of plane waves leading to the delta function and expresses a desire for an explicit derivation from the integral.
  • Another participant suggests using a convergence factor, defining a modified delta function, and discusses its limit as the convergence parameter approaches zero.
  • A third participant questions the rigor of the previous arguments and suggests that understanding the delta function as a distribution might be beneficial for clarity.
  • Concerns are raised about the normalization of the modified delta function, with one participant noting discrepancies in the integral's result compared to the expected value of one.
  • Another participant emphasizes the definition of the delta function in terms of its integral properties and suggests verifying the modified expression against this definition.
  • Corrections are made regarding the normalization factor in the definition of the modified delta function, with a participant acknowledging a missed factor of \(2\pi\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the normalization of the modified delta function and whether the derived expressions meet the expected properties of the delta function. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct formulation and normalization factors.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing rigor in the derivations presented, and participants express uncertainty about the normalization of the modified delta function. The discussion also highlights dependencies on definitions and assumptions related to the delta function.

dsr39
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
When working with Fourier transforms in Quantum mechanics you get the result that
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-ikx}e^{ik'x} = \delta(k-k')[/tex]

I understand conceptually why this must be true, since you are taking the Fourier transform of a plane wave with a single frequency element.

I have also seen it sort of derived by looking at the formula for the Fourier series and tracking its components in the limit that it becomes a continuous Fourier transorm (letting the period go to infinity and [tex]\Delta\omega[/tex] go to 0)

But I really want to come up with some explicit expression, from doing the integral that behaves like a delta function. I have tried messing around with it, by sticking it inside of another integral and multiplying it by a test function etc. Is there a way to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure exactly what you're looking for here. How about this? Insert a "convergence factor" [itex]\exp[-\varepsilon x^2/2][/itex] in the integrand; call the resulting function [itex]\delta_\varepsilon(k)[/itex]:
[tex]\delta_\varepsilon(k)\equiv \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dx\,e^{-\varepsilon x^2/2}e^{ikx}.[/tex]
The result is
[tex]\delta_\varepsilon(k)= (2\pi/\varepsilon)^{1/2}\exp[-k^2/2\varepsilon].[/tex]
Now we want to take the limit [itex]\varepsilon\to 0[/itex]. For [itex]k\ne 0[/itex], the limit is zero, and for [itex]k=0[/itex], the limit is infinity. Furthermore, the integral of [tex]\delta_\varepsilon(k)[/itex] from minus to plus infinity is one. So the function has all the properties of the delta function in this limit.[/tex]
 
I wrote an extremely non-rigorous argument in this thread. If you want to learn to deal with delta functions more rigorously, this is probably a better place to start.

Do you already know that stuff about how to define the delta function as a distribution? I'm just asking because it might help other people to give you a better answer.
 
The convergence factor seems to work, except when I integrate the delta function you defined I don't get 1, I get some constant with pi. Maybe I am doing the integral wrong.
 
The delta function is defined by

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(k) \delta(k - k') \; dk = f(k')[/tex]

So, try plugging in your expression into the above integral, and verify that it gives the correct answer. (Exchange the order of integration, and you should just get the Fourier transform of the Fourier transform of f.)

Note: I think your expression is off by a factor of [itex]2 \pi[/itex].
 
Last edited:
Oops, I missed the [itex]2\pi[/itex] also. I should have written
[tex]\delta_\varepsilon(k)\equiv {1\over2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dx\,e^{-\varepsilon x^2/2}e^{ikx}.[/tex]
and
[tex] \delta_\varepsilon(k)= (1/2\pi\varepsilon)^{1/2}\exp[-k^2/2\varepsilon].[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K