Exploding Mass Problem: Finding Distance Between Two Pieces After Landing

  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass that is freely falling vertically and explodes into two pieces, m1 and m2, which land on the ground simultaneously. The task is to determine the distance between the two pieces after they land, given that one piece falls a distance s from where it would have landed had the explosion not occurred.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of momentum in the x-direction while questioning the treatment of the y-direction due to gravity. There are attempts to relate the velocities of the pieces to the distances they fall and the implications of the center of mass remaining unchanged.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the conservation of momentum and the implications of the center of mass. There is acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by gravity and the instantaneous nature of the explosion, with ongoing exploration of how these factors affect the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of a specified coordinate system and the implications this has on the interpretation of momentum conservation in the vertical direction. There is also mention of the assumption that the explosion is instantaneous, which affects the analysis of the problem.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
here is a problem i am doing

consider a mass which is freely falling vertically down. neglect air resistance. at some point this mass explodes and is divided in two pieces. mass m1 and mass m2. these pieces fall on the ground at the same time. the first piece falls at a distance s from the place it would have landed (straight down) had the explosion not occurred. please find the distance between the pieces after they land on the ground.

here is my attempt. the exploding pieces can have x and y components of the velocities. but we need not consider the y components of the velocities since the linear momentum in y direction is not conserved. if v1 and v2 are the velocities in the
x direction , we can write using conservation of linear momentum.

m_1 v_1=m_2 v_2

Now s=v_1 t.let s' be the horizontal distance covered by the second piece, then
s' = v_2 t. The distance between the pieces then is s+s'.

s+s'=v_1 t + v_2 t

s+s'= \left(1+\frac{m_1}{m_2}\right)v_1 t

s+s'= \left(1+\frac{m_1}{m_2}\right)s

does it sound right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IssacNewton said:
here is a problem i am doing

consider a mass which is freely falling vertically down. neglect air resistance. at some point this mass explodes and is divided in two pieces. mass m1 and mass m2. these pieces fall on the ground at the same time. the first piece falls at a distance s from the place it would have landed (straight down) had the explosion not occurred. please find the distance between the pieces after they land on the ground.

here is my attempt. the exploding pieces can have x and y components of the velocities. but we need not consider the y components of the velocities since the linear momentum in y direction is not conserved.
Since you haven't specified a coordinate system it's hard to judge the truth of this statement for the present case. Momentum is always conserved unless an external force is acting. Are you taking the Y-direction to be the vertical direction?
if v1 and v2 are the velocities in the
x direction , we can write using conservation of linear momentum.

m_1 v_1=m_2 v_2

Now s=v_1 t.let s' be the horizontal distance covered by the second piece, then
s' = v_2 t. The distance between the pieces then is s+s'.

s+s'=v_1 t + v_2 t

s+s'= \left(1+\frac{m_1}{m_2}\right)v_1 t

s+s'= \left(1+\frac{m_1}{m_2}\right)s

does it sound right ?

Looks good.

You could also have used the fact that the trajectory of the center of mass is unaffected by the explosion, so the center of mass should remain at (0,0) on the ground.
 
thanks gneill. yes y is taken as vertical direction... yes CM just comes down straight. but how can we use that fact to solve the problem
 
IssacNewton said:
thanks gneill. yes y is taken as vertical direction... yes CM just comes down straight. but how can we use that fact to solve the problem

If the center of mass is known (well, defined to be at the origin) and there are two pieces of known mass, one of which has a known distance from the center of mass, it should be simple enough to place the other so that the center of mass conditions hold.
 
ok makes sense
 
The explosion can be considered instantaneous, that is the vertical components of the momentum are not affected by gravity during such a short time: Both the vertical and horizontal components will conserved.
But you have the information that both pieces fell to the ground at the same time: Therefore the pieces did not change their y component of velocity.
If the vertical components were different after explosion, they would not arrive at the ground at the same time. When one piece has fallen, conservation of momentum would not hold any more, as the ground means an extra force. In that case, you should find the landing point of both pieces.

ehild
 
thanks ehild...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
922
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K