Explore the Derivation of f'(x) from f(x) = x^2 + 3x + 6

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jayden1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the derivative of the function f(x) = x^2 + 3x + 6. The correct derivative is established as f'(x) = 2x + 3 after simplifying the limit expression. Participants clarify the importance of factoring out 'h' to avoid division by zero during the limit process. The tangent line gradient at x = 0 is confirmed to be 3, not 0, highlighting that the gradient at the vertex of a quadratic function does not always equal zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, specifically limits and derivatives.
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of the limit definition of a derivative.
  • Ability to perform algebraic simplifications and factorizations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the limit definition of a derivative in depth.
  • Practice simplifying expressions involving limits and derivatives.
  • Explore the graphical interpretation of derivatives and tangent lines.
  • Learn about higher-order derivatives and their applications in calculus.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in derivative calculations, and anyone seeking to understand the nuances of polynomial function behavior.

Jayden1
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
So I started with this function: f(x) = x^2 + 3x + 6

I then got this from it:

m = ((((x + h)^2) + (3*(x + h)) + 6) - (x^2 + 3x + 6)) / ((x + h) - x)

Which I eventually simplified to 2x + h^2 + 3h

And then: limit h -> 0: 2x + h^2 + 3h = 2x

So f ' (x) = 2x

Is that right? By doing this, I ended up getting a tangent line gradient of 19 (for x value of 8).

The reason I keep thinking this is wrong is because I thought f(x) = x^2 also ended up with f ' (x) = 2x
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jayden said:
So I started with this function: f(x) = x^2 + 3x + 6
I then got this from it:
m = ((((x + h)^2) + (3*(x + h)) + 6) - (x^2 + 3x + 6)) / ((x + h) - x)
Which I eventually simplified to 2x + h^2 + 3h WRONG
It should have simplified to 2x+h+3.
 
Can you please show me the steps you took in simplifying to I know what I did wrong.
 
Jayden said:
Can you please show me the steps you took in simplifying to I know what I did wrong.

[math]\frac{(x+h)^2+3(x+h)+6-(x^2+3x+6)}{h}[/math]

[math]\frac{x^2+2xh+h^2+3x+3h+6-x^2-3x-6}{h}[/math]

[math]\frac{2xh+h^2+3h}{h}[/math]
 
What h are you supposed to get rid of at this point?

We need to get rid of h because you can't divide by 0. It's just unclear which one of the numerator h's should be divided out...

Or are you supposed to divide every part by h. So you get 2x + h + 3?

is h^2 / h = h?

EDIT: I get it now. Just blame my terrible fractions skills.
 
Jayden said:
Can you please show me the steps you took in simplifying to I know what I did wrong.

Hi Jayden, :)

\[m=\frac{((x + h)^2 + 3(x + h) + 6) - (x^2 + 3x + 6)}{(x + h) - x}\]

\[\Rightarrow m=\frac{x^2+2hx+h^2+3x+3h+6-x^2-3x-6}{h}\]

\[\Rightarrow m=\frac{2hx+h^2+3h}{h}\]

\[\Rightarrow m=\frac{h(2x+3+h)}{h}\]

\[\therefore m=2x+3+h\]

By the way Jayden, as I http://www.mathhelpboards.com/threads/1180-Help-with-limits-tangent-line?p=5743&viewfull=1#post5743, it would be better if you can refresh your knowledge about the order of operations. :)

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Sudharaka said:
Hi Jayden, :)

\[m=\frac{((x + h)^2 + 3(x + h) + 6) - (x^2 + 3x + 6)}{(x + h) - x}\]

\[\Rightarrow m=\frac{x^2+2hx+h^2+3x+3h+6-x^2-3x-6}{h}\]

\[\Rightarrow m=\frac{2hx+h^2+3h}{h}\]

\[\Rightarrow m=\frac{h(2x+3+h)}{h}\]

\[\therefore m=2x+3+h\]

By the way Jayden, as I http://www.mathhelpboards.com/threads/1180-Help-with-limits-tangent-line?p=5743&viewfull=1#post5743, it would be better if you can refresh your knowledge about the order of operations. :)

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.

Saved my life with that. It's not that I don't know the order. It's that I forget things like what you just did with factoring out h. I always forget these things and it makes me get them wrong -.-
 
Jayden said:
Saved my life with that. It's not that I don't know the order. It's that I forget things like what you just did with factoring out h. I always forget these things and it makes me get them wrong -.-

Computing derivatives like this always depends on factoring out an "h" at the end and canceling it with an "h" in the denominator, otherwise you divide by 0 and it won't work. So with these problems always be looking for a way to factor out and cancel an "h".
 
1 question. If you end up with 2x + h + 3.

Then limit -> 0 to get 2x + 3...

f ' (0) = 2*0 + 3

f ' (0) = 3.

Shouldn't the tangent line to x = 0 have a gradient of 0 not 3?
 
  • #10
Jayden said:
f ' (0) = 3.
Shouldn't the tangent line to x = 0 have a gradient of 0 not 3?
Why in the world would you say that?
Why should the tangent at x=0 be any particular value?
 
  • #11
Jayden said:
1 question. If you end up with 2x + h + 3.

Then limit -> 0 to get 2x + 3...

f ' (0) = 2*0 + 3

f ' (0) = 3.

Shouldn't the tangent line to x = 0 have a gradient of 0 not 3?

It doesn't always have to be 0. You'll find tons of examples where it's not 0 so don't worry. In this case it should be 3 at x=0 so everything is good. :)
 
  • #12
lets say we plot the point a on (0, f(0)) (the function being f(x) = x^2 + 3x + 6)

now the derivative of f(x) = x^2 + 3x + 6 is apparently f ' (x) = 2x + 3

f ' (a) = 2*a + 3
f ' (a) = 2*0 + 3
f ' (a) = 3

Is there a different method of getting the derivative with functions like x^2 and f(x) = x^2 + 3x + 6 ?

EDIT: Awesome. Thanks Jameson. I just asumed that the turning point of a quadratic would always have a tangent line with a gradient of 0...
 
  • #13
On a quadratic graph, the gradient will be 0 at the vertex which is also where the graph changes directions. If you have a quadratic in the form of [math]f(x)=ax^2+b[/math] then the gradient at x=0 is 0 but your equation is different. I think the original question is answered so keep the questions coming if you want and make a new thread!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K